Iam64
Deedaa, I’d much prefer to be referred to as the woman.
Me too!
Coming back to this I think it's the optics between the two. Ladies having a connotation of feeble and weak from a bygone era, as in "a lady feeling faint because her corset was laced too tightly" or men patronisingly prone to say at a mixed gathering "not in front of the ladies" "that's no way for a lady to behave" "she's no lady" An onus placed on women to behave in a preordained feminine way, which tends to veer on the side of being delicate and restrained.
Women on the other hand implies strength to me "Votes for Women" as heralded by the Suffragettes, "The Women of Troy" or the BBC production "Riot Women", or one of my latest books "The Women" nurses during the Vietnam war. Women do the serious stuff, Boudica would have definitely been a woman and not a lady if such terminology applied at the time. Ladies do the frivolous stuff, they lunch, they wear lavender as in "Ladies in Lavender" they must not hear anything deemed vulgar, they're fragile and precious, they need to be revived with smelling salts. All archaic I know but the very word is imbued in images of a bygone era.
I'd like to add, that I don't care really, I'm just adding my thoughts to the OP, woman is my preference but I certainly wouldn't dream of opposing anyone who wants the lady/ies description.