Gransnet forums

Ask a gran

What do you think?

(54 Posts)
durhamjen Mon 22-Feb-16 17:15:12

Don't see any point in getting married with that much secrecy and suspicion in the relationship.

Fairydoll2030 Mon 22-Feb-16 17:14:39

He had inherited the money before she knew him, but had obviously told her it was a large amount without being specific.

I agree she should just go ahead and marry him. Makes me sceptical about her motives though.

Bellanonna Mon 22-Feb-16 17:08:04

Mmm. Not sure. Did she know about his windfall before they got engaged? Maybe he's playing safe from a potential goldigger? If I were him I might hesitate to declare my wealth. But I imagine all that would come out once they got married. He's not obliged to declare his assets is he? I'm not sure the advice given was right. He presumably loves her enough to want to settle down with her. But maybe he is just worried, for now, that she wants to grab his cash. I'm not sure anyone can predict if he will talk about his finances once they marry. That's anyone's guess. If she loves him, then marry him for goodness sake. It shouldn't be about money anyway.

Fairydoll2030 Mon 22-Feb-16 16:50:27

I read recently on a problem page in a Sunday paper about a woman (early 30's and childless)who was due to marry a man who, she knew, had inherited 'a large sum ' after his mother's death and before she knew him. He also ran a small business. No mention of whether he was previously married or had children. Her problem was that he would not discuss the details of his inheritance (in other words, how much!) with her, and neither would he allow her access to his business bank account. TBH, I was surprised to see that the reply from the 'relationship expert'. was that she should seriously rethink her relationship with her fiancé if he wasn't completely honest about his financial situation.
My personal opinion is that if they had set up a business together or maybe he had set it up himself AFTER they became engaged, or if he had inherited money AFTERthey knew each other then, fair enough, divulge all. In the event of a divorce then the man (and the woman of course) would be required to show the court details of all their finances anyway.
Was this a case of 'what's yours is mine - and what's mine's my own!'
What do gransnetters think?