Anyone know if *Iam64* is ok?

FannyCornforth

NellG was banned

How do you know FannyCornforth? I'm genuinely perplexed as to how you get to know these things about what's gone on between a poster and GNHQ.

I don't think so

Nell G wasn’t NellieMoser was she? I haven’t seen her for ages.

FannyCornforth

NellG was banned

Not another one!

#BrendafromBristol

I've bin very gud until today, Miss.

Wow! I miss so many of these happenings. Better keep quiet then

NellG was banned

I haven’t seen NellG on here for some time, now I think of it.

Tizliz please do post on threads - it's good to hear different voices.

Now, Callistemon, do not make promises you cannot keep!

I will not make fun of my lovely teecher
X 100
(sorree, I do promis to behave in future)

PS, please don't let Doodle know, she will gloat!

I confess to not paying attention and not reading the thread!
Callistemon a hundred lines, you cheeky besom!

Ooh, a gleeful moment!
My Maffs teecher has misspelt a word!

(sorry, Miss Marydoll, I will behave now, promis.)

PROBABLY not probly.

mokryna, you have misunderstood my post. I am NOT talking about this thread. As I have already stated upthread, my statement was a generalisation about previous threads. It shows one to has to read and re-read, before posting to ensure absolute clarity. Even then one will probly not get it quite right.

I rest my case.

I think the wading in is hypothetical, mokryna

Calendargirl

Lucca

Marydoll

Part of the problem is that some posters wade in, without reading the whole thread, when the situation has already been resolved. People then become upset, when that situation could have been avoided!

Oh so true! The “wading in” and the not reading the thread, really bugs me.

It annoys me also, when it’s obvious that other replies haven’t been read.
This has been debated before, only to be told that people can’t be expected to ‘wade’ through several pages.
That is why threads are repetitive and often quite boring.

But this is not an old thread Wed 30-Jun-21

sodapop

Whoops just realised it's an old thread - sorry

I think a lot of old threads are brought back to life by scammers unfortunately - I was reading one the other day thinking 'I remember a thread about this a while back' and 'Oh! so-and-so is posting, that's good, haven't seen her/him post for ages' - took a while for the penny to drop when I noticed the date on the posts and the last post was a bit obscure. It was nice seeing all those names though, from a few years ago.

Thank you!

Yes MissA I remember that thread. It got quite silly how outraged people were about a small child making a mess and it wasn't even a real problem. Nice to see you back btw.

You're right Callistemon
I don't think that 'they' really exist in any functional sense.
Just pop in every now and again to see that noone has burnt the house down.
I think that GN is quite a small concern, and all the better for it!

Threads do get repetitive I agree, but sometimes you just want to let the OP you are interested and not ignoring them personally.
I often write that I agree with previous posters so the OP knows I have acknowledged them.

Alegrias1

shush WWM2

They don't know we're here.

They don't read everything so we just have to keep quiet

Shhh, everyone , I shall say this only once, whisper very quietly and no raucous singing

Boris and Carrie getting married was another one.
Pages and pages of posts asking if Boris was Catholic; was Carrie Catholic; could they get married in a Catholic church; did the Catholic church recognise his previous marriages; blah blah blah
If they'd read just two pages in they would have seen that it has all been done and dusted two hours in.