I agree that children should be treated equally. We take the view that if either of them needed a larger sum (eg if they were about to be homeless, hungry or needed a vital operation) we would give as much as we could to help without compensating the other one, but otherwise they get the same. Not the same presents, but the same rough amount spent on them - I wouldn't give one a box of chocolates and the other a car
.
Our will splits whatever we have to leave between them, with instructions to sort out whatever possessions they don't put in a skip and share those too. So far, my daughter wants my jewellery (not in the Hatton Garden category
) and my son wants the record collection. That may change of course, as I hope we hang around a bit longer. They are both solvent, but if one worked to get a better-paid job than the other, I don't see it as fair that they should be means-tested by their parents. Our job was to give them the same start in life, not to keep their standard of living equal.
I have considered a secret santa, or a charity shop rule, but my children sometimes go to in-laws for Christmas, so I don't know how that would work. If anyone has any tips about how theirs work, I'd be interested to hear them. We don't have grandchildren yet, so presents can't move down a generation, but it feels like we are all looking for ways to spend money, as everyone has everything they need. It sometimes feels like we are buying for the sake of it, and it's all a bit pointless. We all like giving things to one another, but it's not easy to know what to get.
As for what is a reasonable amount for a gift, that is impossible to answer. It really is the thought that counts, not the amount.