Chocolatenoodle8
When my Dad died just over ten years ago, his pharmacist asked us to return any unused in date medicines, “so I can reissue them”. I was furious as the pharmacist had already been paid for issuing Dad’s medications. I returned none of the meds to him.
I don’t understand this. Your dad was issued medication (presumably free) and sadly no longer needs it, but you are ‘furious’ at the thought of it being given to someone else, as the pharmacist had already been paid for issuing it, so you let it go to waste?
The pharmacist would be paid to fulfil the other patient’s prescription regardless of the cost of the drugs. He or she would just have been trying to save the NHS money. Unless I’ve misunderstood, that is a very strange attitude - surely it’s better to reissue whatever can be reissued than to waste it in case someone makes money on the deal? I think the only money involved would be that saved by the NHS, but in any case what difference does it make if the pharmacist made a profit?
