Why should banks have to refund money to people who have been scammed and ignored all intervention from their bank to stop it happening? A friend of mine, an intelligent 60 year old, has fallen for a romance scam. To cut a long story short she has given this man the inheritance from her parents totalling just over £200.000 and has been left with very little to live on. She only told her friends after it had been going on for 4 months and she could no longer contact this man by either phone or email. During these months her bank regularly spoke to her about these transactions but she insisted the money was paid. Of course, now, she wants the bank to refund her money. As she is my friend, I feel for her but I am also getting cross with her constant criticism of her bank who have repaid her £11.000 but no more. If a customer has lost money due to a banks negligence then you would expect your cash refunded but why should they be expected to refund such a huge amount when they tried so hard to stop the transactions. What do GN's think?
Book Title by Their Authors (Parlour Game)
Henry Nowak…….an absolute tragedy.


. I mean free at point of use.)