paddyann54
Would it be controlled who can buy it? Otherwise no I won’t sign
Think of the horrors if young thugs or men on the prowl could use this on their victims .
No thank you.
Good point paddyann54.
Also, as PaynesGrey points out (above), in such an attack - it might be of little use.
It's a bit of a knee-jerk response to a complex problem. Apart from the motive of the attacker - which I am not going to speculate (publicly) on - public spending cuts over the years have left our police forces, judiciary, and prison services woefully under-staffed.
In late 2023, the BTP was instructed to make £5 million in savings, which could only be achieved through a recruitment freeze, leaving them short by 274 staff members. (source: Google AI)
Of course, we can't expect BTP to be in every carriage or on every train journey, or indeed police officers to be on every street corner, but generally speaking, surely a more intense police presence on both the streets and public transport, might act as a deterrent to those anti-social yobs who plague both and who probably instinctively know they are unlikely to be apprehended?
With random attacks (historical), it has been the case that the perpetrator is discovered to have had serious mental health problems, and that is another area where the services are severely underfunded.
Perhaps a pepper-spray might be useful if you are walking home late at night along a quiet street, but what if the attacker managed to wrestle it from you?
I dunno what the answer is, but I'm not signing because of the reasons given by others, and because it's a 'sticking-plaster' solution...