I find your attitude about politeness and rudeness towards TV journalists odd. Evan Davies is a journalist who presents a news programme. Why is he fair game for rudeness and impolite comments?
I do agree that comments about a person's appearance, when it is not a choice, ie a physical attribute one is born with, is always inappropriate. e.g. mocking the way someone walks because they have CP
If, however, a person chooses to dye their hair in black and white stripes and walk round only in underpants then they are fair game for public comment, and probably enjoy it!
Gransnet forums
Blogs
The wrong kind of refugee?
In recent years, the world has witnessed a refugee crisis that has forced more than a million men, women and children to flee the brutal violence in their own countries. Yet despite the life-threatening situations they face, these refugees (including children) have often been met with a degree of suspicion and fear in the nations they have escaped to.
Author Barbara Fox, whose own mother was evacuated from inner-city Newcastle as a child, wonders what the difference between Britain's long-ago children and today's refugees is?
Are today's refugees really any different?
When I read a headline recently about the outrage of a 'picturesque' village to which 70 'child migrants' were to be sent, I was reminded of another time in our history when places in the countryside were obliged to welcome strangers into their midst.
Back in 1940 when she was six years old, my mother, Gwenda, and her older brother, Doug, were among the hundreds of thousands of children who left their inner-city homes and were evacuated to the countryside to escape the German bombs.
Gwenda's main memory of her journey from Newcastle to the Lake District centres round the banana she was given to eat by her mother – the last she was to see for several years. A teacher ordered the children to sit on their bags, and consequently, when Gwenda came to unpack later, she found squashed banana over all her belongings.
On arrival in the pretty village of Bampton they were lined up in the church hall while the villagers came to choose who they wanted. Yes, it does seem unbelievable that that was how the evacuees were billeted to their families! You might imagine that Gwenda and Doug – clean, nicely dressed children - would have been snapped up first (they would surely be the refugees that no one would protest about today!). But actually, that was not the case. Gwenda was the youngest child there as she was tagging along with Doug and his class of nine-year-olds - their mother had insisted that the pair should not be separated. Consequently, the locals were expecting older children, and someone of Gwenda's size probably didn't look very useful in this farming community.
Were these home-grown children that our rural communities welcomed back then really so different from the oft-maligned refugee children today?
Gwenda and Doug were the only children left when the wife of the village headmaster arrived. As the mother of two sons, she had to be persuaded to take a girl. However, she relented, and so the children went home with her. They would spend three happy years living in the schoolhouse and Gwenda would keep in touch with the couple she called 'Aunty' and 'Uncle' for the rest of their lives.
The following year, in more desperate circumstances, Bampton opened its doors to another influx of children, this time from the shipbuilding town of Barrow-in-Furness.
Undoubtedly thousands of lives were saved by this evacuation of the nation's children, and indeed, Gwenda and Doug's own street in Newcastle was bombed.
Britain also welcomed refugees from Europe, including thousands of Jewish children who might otherwise have perished.
Were these home-grown children that our rural communities welcomed back then really so different from the oft-maligned refugee children today? I would go so far as to say that the inner-city children who turned up in Bampton were often just as alien to their rural hosts as the foreign newcomers seem to be to the 'picturesque' village dwellers. But equally, both could teach something to the other.
Those harking back to 'when Britain was great' perhaps forget that it was also characterised by our opening our doors to those in need.
When the War Is Over by Barbara Fox, the story of Gwenda’s wartime evacuation, is published by Sphere and is available from Amazon.
By Barbara Fox
Twitter: @Gransnet
I can't understand your logic mair you utterly object to people being rude about Trumps wife, and yet use this as an excuse to be voffensive about a journalist. Talk about double standards
BBC journalists are all left wing devilspawn maybe

Oh, I thought they were all right wingers according to the BBC bias thread...
Mair I have never encountered anyone on GN who seems to hate everyone else so much. What is your problem?
It is all a matter of perspective.... The BBC will never be anyone's favourite..perhaps because, despite what L & R wingers say they do try to report truth not bias.
They may not always succeed and of course if they report something and I feel it does not support my opinion they are biased! 
If they are accused of bias by both sides, they do cancel one another out.
What in earth is going on here? Somebody on tv is described as grinning like a monkey, so what? The term means grinning widely, and has nothing to do with his physical appearance ( he wasn't described as being a monkey) is this a new form of PC?
Your two weeks aren't up yet rose
ww such a shame that you can't go along with my idea of being nicer .My comment is not rude or sniping nor is it addressed to any one poster.It is genuine bewilderment that a poster cannot use the term grinning like a monkey.I had hoped we had left all the point scoring behind. Sadly not.
It seems as though some haven't even managed two days. Although of course, some of you didn't sign up for it, did you?
No why on earth would I want to? .
I have been accused of trying to influence what posters can say ( simply for a pleasanter Gransnet) and yet now we have a poster ( Mair) being told what phrases she can use/not use in a PC kind of way.
Trump, Boris, Gove, and Melania Trump have all been dissed for the way they look on this forum, and nobody has batted an eyelid .
No it was for the hypocracy. She was criticised for her comment about a journalist, but she then moaned about criticism of Trumps wife. Double standards I said. Personally I think neither of it is acceptable but there you go.
Now you are criticising what people have said again. Is this for a more pleasant GN or defending a particular poster whose political stance you generally agree with?
No why on earth would I want to?
Says it all...
ww why would you want to ?
Well, quite a few posters seem to think that it was a good idea, and make the news and politics pages a better place...they could see all the snippy comments/ sarcasm and general unpleasant tone of it and didn't like it.
However, PC or rather faux PC doesn't have a place either, and if somebody wants to comment on a mannerism of a tv presenter, why on earth shouldn't they.
If some GNs want to distance themselves from the heat on the political site I am totally neutral about it I think it is entirely their own business and none of mine. Not sure why I should though.
With regard to monkey comment please see my post above.
It would not matter a jot who had said the phrase ww including yourself, I would have wondered why on earth anybody thought it was wrong.We all know it means a wide grin, and there was a context as well,Davies was saying it wasn't worth the screening(while grinning) and a Welsh doctor correcting him.This really is a storm in a teacup.
As you wish rose I beg to disagree, but in your new phase of niceness I don't want to push it,
Is it or is it not allowed for people to object to a phrase used to describe someone?
If we can agree everyone is entitled to express an opinion (as long as it does not break the law) that would be a step forward!
The next step is to be able to hear the different opinons and argue/ back up why you hold your opinion and NOT to ridicule the opposite opinion/ opinion holder.
Can we do it? 
I would hope so.
In that case, why do some posters think that the phrase should not be used?I could see that if the presenter had been black/Asian then there could be an insult in it, but otherwise?
If we can agree everyone is entitled to express an opinion (as long as it does not break the law) that would be a step forward!
Certainly would be Pens!
Roses,
I think it's very clear the anger was purely from Evan Davies's fan club, had I said it about say Boris they wouldn't have given a hoot.
It was faux 'offence'.
This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion


