Thanks for another book, GN, it is lovely to receive these new challenges. I do agree with previous posts about the complexity of the plotting though I was impressed by the way the timeline and the characters were woven into some form of coherent picture by the end.
I fear the language is reflective of a generation and words my father would never have used in public — indeed would have meant anyone using them in his home would have never been invited again — are now used by primary school children. I don't like it, but it is probably accurate.
I found the book tragic, and far from the amusing comedy and 'hilarious' satire referred to in the reviews. 'Bleak' would be my one-word description, with its unlikeable characters (with the notable exception of the GP, who appears to be derided for her honourable and caring conduct), self-made dilemmas, and selfish lifestyles. So I would ask Mark Lawson, firstly, did he enjoy spending so long in the company of this set of characters, and secondly, whether he felt the reviews chosen to entice readers to pick up the book accurately reflected how he sees the book?
I admired the skill of the writing, but can't say I enjoyed reading it. Thanks for expanding my reading to new areas and stopping my brain getting too stuck in its rut!