This is a good thread, I like to read other peoples' reading turn offs, as much as their favourites. At the moment I'm reading a book, I use that term loosely, because it's almost unreadable. "Lincoln in the Bardo" which won the Booker Prize just gone. Thankfully it was given to me I didn't waste money on it. There's been such a buzz around it, I'd wanted to read it for a while. What a disappointment! I'm keeping going because I keep wondering if I'm missing something, it's pretty devoid of a narrative and mainly comprises of the numerous citations of dead people. I want to like it but I don't. I'm only reading it on the side I've got another, more enjoyable book on the go.
Reading through other's comments here, I think Margaret Atwood's books can be a mixed bag. I absolutely loved "The Blind Assassin" one of my best ever reads, also thought "Alias Grace" and "Cat's Eye" were both excellent. Really didn't like "Hagseed" or her latest "The Heart Goes Last". I never bothered with Hilary Mantel's historical novels, I did enough about the Tudors at school to last a lifetime, but did like the Ghazza Street one set in Saudi Arabia. Struggled with David Mitchell's "Cloud Atlas", my son loved it and I can see what a clever concept it was, but for me it was all a bit of a penance. I've never read Martin Amis but my husband has and thinks he is seriously over rated. A stand out hated book of mine was "The Lovely Bones" I really loathed it, I remember when Richard and Judy first launched their book club it won their best read category, pipping the sublime "Star of the Sea" by Joseph O'Connor at the post. I loved the latter so much, it was runner up, when the winner was announced, I picked up the steaming pile of turgid bones and hurled it a the telly 