Hello Everyone! Let's talk about blooming awful books.
As mentioned elsewhere, it's quite difficult to remember them if you give up as soon as you realise that you aren't going to get anywhere with it.
Unlike my dear Grandmother who feels that she has to see them through to the bitter end. Many is the time she has said to me, 'Thank goodness I've finished that; it was a complete load of rubbish'.
Ruth Rendell books are a mystery to me. (no pun intended!) Having read more than 20 of her books I have decided to only read her Wexford stories in the future. Her other novels have a strange, weird theme usually and have a scenario that is ludicrous. I love a thriller but it has to be a little bit plausible.
Apologies to RR fans but I shall be giving a pile of her tales to the charity shops.
I'm ploughing through this thread but haven't read it all yet. So far no one has mentioned Joanna Harris. I think that's her name. "Chocolat" I didn't connect with at all, then there was another one about blackberries which left me equally cold.
I can’t get into Hilary Mantel’s books either. I once heard her on the radio rubbishing another author’s books and wanted to tell her out that not everyone rated hers.
Ooh thought of another one - Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall - read great reviews about it so picked up a copy from the library. Couldn't get beyond a couple of chapters - her writing style is really not my cup of tea, to put it politely. I often find books that have won awards are nowhere near as good as they are cracked up to be.
Narcissus and Goldmund is one of my favourite books, difficult to get hold of though. I eventually got mine from an old bookshop. I like Sara Baume unusual books.
I’ve decided to abandon The Three Body Problem for now. I’m sure someone much brighter than me will understand what on Earth is going on, but I really can’t. You can’t win ‘em all.
I’ve just remembered another I couldn’t make head nor tail of. The Seven Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle. What the heck was that all about?
I read this before you previous post and thought "hmm, she should have said 'either' not 'too' " . And then I read the other post and the penny dropped, haha!
No apologies needed, mine was just a winky, light-hearted comment
Just My Luck. Received it at Christmas. Can’t remember the author and I gave it away. Apparently she has written loads of books and having them published at a rate of one a year!,!
I’ve decided to abandon The Three Body Problem for now. I’m sure someone much brighter than me will understand what on Earth is going on, but I really can’t. You can’t win ‘em all.
My daughter gave me a copy of “The Hunting Party” last year because she said it had good reviews. It’s about a bunch of shallow, unlikable yuppies who get snowed in at a hunting lodge they have rented in Scotland, and one of them is murdered. Half way through I would cheerfully have volunteered to help the murderer see off the rest of them too, in short order. Stereotyped characters, poor writing and more holes in the plot than a Swiss cheese!
That did make me laugh ??
Maggiemaybe I think I must have rubbish taste too - so many classics and prize winning books I just can't get on with.
And like some other posters if the book is badly written with numerous spelling and grammar mistakes I get distracted from the plot and find myself rewriting it in my head.
You have to persevere with Captain Corelli, past the first 100 pages, then it gets into its stride and is worth reading.
Never been able to enjoy Thomas Hardy, which is sad as I live in Dorset, and know people who wanted to call their children Eustacia and Bathsheba, or even Jude.
Vicky I disagree with everything apart from Catcher in the Rye , I’m not sure why it was such a ‘must read’ book. I think I read it in a day, while home with a sick child, and was completely underwhelmed.