Gransnet forums

Chat

14 year old 'gets away with it'

(63 Posts)
Anagram Wed 04-Jul-12 13:45:44

No, I realise that, but it seems that excuses are being made for this boy, and others like him, more and more these days.

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 13:39:50

Of course they are old enough to know at fourteen. But hormones at that age can exert an overwhelming pull. I'm not exactly excusing what he did. It was horrible. But it's not always black and white is it?

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 13:36:29

Anagram, No, I don't think a five year old girl should be left in the care of an fourteen year old boy. I would not have done that with my girls.

Anagram Wed 04-Jul-12 13:28:45

So it's the parents' fault, is it J04? They knowingly placed their child in harm's way...?
I thin 14 is old enough to know rape is wrong, whatever they've been watching online.

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 13:01:27

According to the Mirror it was a little girl.

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 13:00:31

Yes Glass. I was thinking that.

POGS do you think the parents of the four year old were right leaving her in the care of a fourteen year old adolescent boy? One with access to the internet. As, indeed, they all do these days.

POGS Wed 04-Jul-12 12:46:13

What about the poor little 4 year old boy! He didn't do anything wrong. He will never 'Get away with it' !

He will probably have a lifetime of hell.

glassortwo Wed 04-Jul-12 12:28:22

This again raises the point absent made in her thread... children having access to inappropriate information.

www.gransnet.com/forums/am_i_being_unreasonable/1192782-Its-all-very-well-to-laugh

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 11:48:33

I think the judge got it right.

Bl** internet has got a lot to answer for.

whenim64 Wed 04-Jul-12 11:46:50

Yes, it's the same one, Jingle

j04 Wed 04-Jul-12 11:43:24

I was just reading about this one. Don't know if it's the one you are posting about whenim, but I was wondering what people think about it.

Can't remember how I came to be on the Mirror webpage! blush grin

Hunt Wed 04-Jul-12 11:37:28

Thanks for that, When. Sounds pretty comprehensive to me.

whenim64 Wed 04-Jul-12 10:56:11

The media are full of stories about a 14 year old boy who abused a 4 year old, claiming he 'got away with it.' The truth is that he has been made subject to a SOPO (Sexual Offences Prevention Order) which means the police can enter his home and check whether he has access to a computer, or has any inappropriate items in the home, or anywhere else he goes. He will be monitored by nominated specialist police officers who also supervise registered sex offenders. His case will be discussed at multi-agency public protection meetings, and all professionals who know him will contribute current assessments of his risk. If he flouts the SOPO they'll come down on him like a ton of bricks. He now has to undergo regular assessments and receive any treatment deemed necessary. If he doesn't comply, he will be back before the court. This way of managing young people who are assessed as having acted out of curiosity is an alternative to diversion from custody with no intervention at all. In effect, he is being treated in the same way as a convicted offender who has to undergo probation treatment and police supervision. I hope the child gets ten times that amount in support!