Sorry if you could not read between the lines of my sarcastic yeah right
It is my shorthand for saying that unless there are transparent rules as to what divorced partners are entitled to, then I assume that the system works in favour of men.
As it did in this country for a very long time - until it was made clear in law that women were entitled to half the financial assets including pensions.
I say "women" because they have often contributed a lesser amount in wages, and are the most frequent petitioners. Until there is equality of opportunity and income, divorce laws will predominantly protect women.
So you get an all male hierarchy of the church, very cosy with a verynearlyall male hierarchy in irish politics, coming up with a lip service law that suits men.
The Both spouses and children (if any) be properly and adequately provided for is deeply patronising, sexist and because there is no public record of judgements, impossible for the public to monitor or evaluate.
Apparently in practice you have to not only prove you have been "separated" for 10 years, but then wait a very long time for a judge to hear your case.