Well I am not arguing with the figures, but this is a gross over simplification of the way it all works. How much do you think it costs to get the aid to the right places? The cost of chartering aircraft, running warehouses and buying in equipment, shelters, medical equipment, water purification equipment? Much of this is high tech and expensive.
More from snouts in the trough.
"Its shops raise £89.9m, but cost £67.6m, leaving just £22.3m for charity. Not great, considering the people working in the shops are mostly volunteers. "
Charity shops have to pay rent, and a business rate tax, even if it is reduced.
They have to insure and heat and maintain premises, pay transport to get goods from central collection points to their locations.
Each shop has a paid manager and some assistants and volunteers who do have to be trained and managed.
www.theguardian.com/voluntary-sector-network/2012/aug/21/get-ahead-charity-shop-manager.
"Oxfam has a clear career path for the managers of its 700 UK shops who start on a minimum salary of between £15,840 to £19,489 depending on store turnover."
More snouts comments.
" Of the £229.1m available for charitable work, £90.6m is handed out in grants to other charities. As they will certainly have managerial and administrative costs of 20% or more, that’s another £18.1m not available for real charity."
There are a large number of UK charities who give grants to other local charities.
The DEC (disaster emergency committee) pool resources for urgent aid. If there is a need in a particular area and say Oxfam doesn't have workers there but another organisation does, then they should of course support those groups who know the local situation.
How do "snouts" judge what is real charity!
One thing "real charity" is not is just handing out emergency aid. All the big agencies promote projects to improve health, education and community development
It is all too easy to it a spin on the "figures" if you do not bother to analyse or mention what the actual costs are.
The basic administration costs for Oxfam as I stated earlier, with the link to the report, about 12% of their income. That is pretty good.
A report on charity admin costs seem to indicate that within reason its counter productive to spend too small a proportion on administration.
giving-evidence.com/2013/05/02/admin-data/