ISIS girl

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I do not think the Home Secretary had any choice. It is very sad indeed that this young woman was brainwashed in her early teens, but he had to take everything into account.

This is a very high profile case and being lenient would have sent out a message that UK is a soft touch for terrorists.

The woman herself is asking for forgiveness, but sadly it is clear from her interviews that the brainwashing is alive and well in her. She clearly has no grasp of the values that we hold dear.

I feel very sorry indeed for this young woman and others like her; but I do think the Home Sec has made the right decision.

And yes, I do understand that part of our value system is to treat vulnerable people in a civilised way, but there is more to this - it is not black and white.

“Pig ignorant racist lot that voted us out of the EU”

Really gonegirl?????

My goodness Gonegirl someone’s touched a nerve there. What a rant. And a slur to all who voted Leave.

GNHQ are you going to let gonegirl insult people ?

Yes. Really. And, yes, it is a slur to many, probably the majority, of those who voted us out.

Sorry to go off-topic.

Harrigran Insults come in all forms & from all directions. There won't be a lot of posts left if we all become too delicate!

I think the problems with brexit and the problems with ISIS are separate issues, and to suggest that people who are concerned about ISIS and all it means are automatically the ones who voted to leave the EU is misguided.

GrannyGravy, her job would be far easier if she returned here------nobody breathing down her neck ( Daesh ) ? This is exactly how they operate and given her indifference on seeing beheadings it would only be a matter of time before there was another atrocity.

We already have 3,000 extremists here who are " on a list " and MI5 are particularly concerned about these people. They are under regular surveillance and watched a lot of the time.

Those who've returned from Syria after working for ISIS are stopped upon entry to the UK, interviewed and asked if they are sorry and wish to go on a prevent scheme. They're also told that they'll be monitored for a while and/or tagged with restrictions in place if authorities deem necessary.

Prior to travelling to Syria, if found to have watched a certain website their passports are then confiscated to prevent them from travelling to Syria.

My belief in the reason why this girl hasn't been allowed back is due to how the Met police first handled the case. The girl's parents hadn't wanted her to go to Syria so her father had rang police telling them of her arrangement and their answer was that " they saw no reason why she shouldn't go ".
The father had expressed his fear but the Met ignored him.

As a consequence she has now become a political football as does happen when police make a blunder which needs to be covered up. This in mind any appeals that her family make for her return will fall on deaf ears. Anything to do with the Met falls on deaf ears-----I know only too well when it comes to covering their mistakes.

Can I just say that one of our AC has spent the majority of his career in the armed forces trying to flush out and bring Daesh to an end.

Not always in conflict, normally intelligence led, We are so proud of what they and their colleagues do for the UK each and every day.

EV my experience of how the UK is protected is somewhat different to yours.

Perhaps I was just commenting on the general intelligence of the Great British Public at the moment. It does seem to have gone downhill. Or, there is more chance these days to display narrow-mindedness.

That's where the council flat comes in Urmstongran. An example of what I was trying to explain to Lily who hadn't believed me.

Her Twitter account will be " watched " as will all her other accounts and if she hits a particular website she'll be arrested.

GrannyGravy I am immensly grateful to our armed forces for what they have done in recent years.

Ellan Vannin how do you know " that is exactly how they operate". Are you part of the secret service? If so take care or your cover will be blown!
Or maybe you just have access to the same information we all do and are expressing a personal opinion rather than actual known facts?
It is that type of faux knowledge statement that social media, lack if neutral reporting encourages. Very little in our newspapers or on TV news is neutral.

I haven't read the whole thread but I think this girl and her baby should be allowed back into this country. She was 15 when she went. People make mistakes when they are young. I think as a country we need to show compassion although she would need to be closely monitored. This does not mean I am not also deeply caring towards all the people killed at the hands of IS.

My gut reaction was to feel as many posters here do, that this girl freely went to join Isis and should not be allowed back into this country. On reflection, it is obviously more complex. I feel proud that we are a country that upholds the law, whatever someone has done they get a fair trial. It appears that is is unlawful to remove someone's citizenship and leave them stateless, and there is disagreement whether she has Bangladeshi citizenship. This will rightly I think, be challenged in Court whatever the Home Secretary has stated. Would it be better for her to be here and monitored and on a de radicalisation programme, if they cannot find enough evidence to try her in court, or leave her to continue on her destructive radical path in a refugee camp or indeed Bangladesh, feeling even more hatred towards this country?

GNHQ can I request that my response to gonegirl at 09.33 is also deleted, as it contains the main part of her post.

Thank you

On reflection, I don't think this is the most sensible or pragmatic decision either.
Whilst I don't think we should rush to bring her back here, or help her return in any way (she is presumably safe enough where she is now), it would be better for her family to arrange for her to come back here, take her in and look after her here.
She can then be monitored by the security services, we will know her whereabouts and whosoever she contacts.

What will happen if she goes to Bangladesh? They won't want her and she and the child will be possibly taken in by Daesh supporters to become a danger in the future.

Your last paragraph Jalima I 100% agree with ??

This, from an article in ‘The Independent’ dated 31 October 2017:

“The Government plans to give jihadis council houses and other support as part of de-radicalisation programmes have been welcomed as “overdue” by terror experts.

Right-wing commentators have branded the proposals, codenamed Operation Constrain, as “beyond sick” and accused authorities of seeking to bribe extremists.

But analysts say there is an urgent need to coordinate police, intelligence, mental health and social work for thousands of potential threats who are known to authorities but cannot be jailed.

UK terror threat from Isis and right wing groups 'not diminishing'
They include the 20,000 extremists who have appeared on the security services’ radars but are not deemed to be a sufficient risk for round-the-clock surveillance – the category that Westminster attacker Khalid Masood, Manchester bomber Salman Abedi and London Bridge ringleader Khuram Butt fell into.

The growing pool will be joined by former Isis members returning from the group’s shrinking territories in Syria and Iraq.

A report released last week said 425 men, women and children have already returned to the UK and the fate of more than 400 other jihadis who travelled to Isis strongholds remains unclear.

Operation Constrain, due to be implemented next year, will see targets moved to the front of council housing waiting lists if they have no suitable homes, helped into education, training or employment and referred to the NHS for mental health treatment.”

Conegirl would it surprise you that I voted Remain ? I gathered that it was the " Conservative " way to vote.

PECS----I don't wish to digress from this case but I do have another case in mind where the Met have covered up their mistakes as well as an area of police officers, so know only too well.

Unfortunately the idea of "deradicalising" this young woman is flawed. Firstly because it is not a foolproof process and people can blag their way through; and secondly it cannot be made compulsory (except by a court) and my guess is she would simply either not co-operate or just go through the motions whilst retaining her radical views.