I watched a TV programme this week about Liverpool, it was a follow up to its previous series were they were selling older houses for £1. It updated on how the project was progressing, and showed some completed ones. Another lady has got keys to hers now, and has been getting quotes from the builder, they are working on a budget she said of £25k. My question is, if Liverpool can spend money on the things you have spoken of, and one of these houses is going to cost a similar amount of £25k to become habitable why have the local authority sold them off in the first place.? There were several streets of these properties which formed a triangle I believe and yet the houses that had been allocated were randomly allocated so that people said they are nervous about leaving them because they could be vandalised. Wireless a whole street at a time could have been a better way of doing it for security to these people. I understand that originally they were not LA properties but privately owned. With the continual housing shortage everywhere, I think Liverpool have missed an opportunity to do all of these house up themselves and shorten the waiting lists so that many more people could be re housed. The rent/ revenue could pay for other things over time that are less essential ...in my view.
Old sayings with a theme 2 ( continuing *nanna8*'s thread)
Last weekend, in Rutland, the first statue in Britain of the late Elizabeth II was unveiled.