This might get interesting

Chewbacca Oh come on! How many people lok at the small print when they are in love? And it's not exactly a law that is used everyday is it? Or one you would expect in a democracy.

Caveat emptor trisher

I fear this is only the beginning of the turmoil that will break Harry's heart, over and over again.

I had hoped that Meghan would bring happiness into his life, and it gives me NO satisfaction whatsoever to have my initial misgivings proved to be correct.

I just don't understand why it's all Meghan's fault. We have no idea what the dynamic in the relationship is. It's all supposition.

If no one owns a language I can now call myself
Princess of Wales ?

Harry loved shooting, stalking, fishing,Polo - Megan is against so -

Harry gives them up

Megs going to announce her pregnancy at the wedding, who the hell does she think she is?

www.ibtimes.com/meghan-markle-pregnant-duchess-allegedly-tries-hide-growing-baby-bump-canada-2924964

Another boring knocking a woman thread ???

From the couple own website:

The statement read: 'While there is not any jurisdiction by The Monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word "Royal" overseas, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use "Sussex Royal" or any iteration of the word "Royal" in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs Spring 2020.'

The couple also insisted that security 'to protect them and their son' is necessary amid controversy surrounding the estimated £3million - £6million protection bill that would be split between taxpayers in Canada and the UK.

Sounds as though there has been some bitching/complaining going on....M wanted more than she is getting. Probably forgets that she is not an expert on UK law.

I think a lot of us feel the same as you Urmstongran

I had hoped for the best for Harry but feared the worst.

Thank you pinkquartz ,

So security is necessary, then pay for it.

People who want to "disappear" frequently set up Worldwide Charitable Foundations ?

And if you set up a Charitable Foundation you get a load of tax relief
plus, you only have to donate a small part of the income to charity.
So H&M will gain a lot of money while looking as if they are just "doing good" in the world.

Is this the truth if the statement "working towards financial independence"

Oh here we go with the ‘she’s faking the pregnancy’ stories again from the tinfoil brigade.

No wonder they left the country.

Let's not criticise our betters, eh?

They are special like rainbows and unicorns...

I think it is time to re-evaluate the cost of, and the necessity for, the security of two people and their child who are very publicly distancing themselves from Britain and the Royal family.

£3-6 million is a huge amount to protect one family and I certainly don't see why Canada should be expected to contribute. By leaving Britain they are exposing themselves to risk, but at the same time reducing their publicity value.

People resident here would benefit far more if this money were used in policing the streets to reduce the knife crime which takes so many lives.
The greater good?

Is there any truth to the story that it's surrogate twins?

Can't find the link from Independent.
Good house keeping-
www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/a27152841/is-meghan-markle-having-twins/

That twins article was dated April 2019, so it would be the longest twin pregnancy ever recorded. Surrogate? No evidence that a surrogate is needed. They seem to be productive enough without any help

Any more wild suggestions to throw into the pot?

Agree eazybee they want out, get out and pay for everything
themselves

I wonder if Diana was alive - Would Meghan would get on with her?
Maybe she would help her write her book?
Diana would want Hewitt mentioned of course.

They wouldn't get on at all - both would want all of Harry's love and attention - DiL and MiL would both be posting on GN and MN about how the other was manipulating him and estranging him from them!

If they're not royal any more, just 'celebs', do they need security or more security than, say, a film actor?

Is there any truth to the Hewitt connection?

ananimous - if you mean whether Hewitt was Harry's father then the answer is no. You only have to look into Harry's eyes to see he is most definitely Charles's son. They have the same eyes.

Teeth show more DNA traits though...