Gransnet forums

Chat

Grandchild for a summer break?

(38 Posts)
Juniper1 Wed 08-Jul-20 17:40:15

Grandchild usually comes for school hols, half term and week in the summer.
Wrestling to decide whether she can come this August. We are early 70’s, healthy, fit. In East Midlands. Child is 8, healthy fit, from London.

We want to see her, she wants to see us. We usually do a whole variety of activities not currently available. Can we say yes or is it more sensible to keep ourselves save for the future?
Cannot find the means to decide.

Lindylou57 Thu 09-Jul-20 12:03:43

I see no problem in it at all. I am seeing my grandchild, daughter and SIL just as I did pre lockdown now. There have been no new cases in our area for weeks now. So long as you are careful when out and about, continue with all the safety precautions etc thing will be ok. Enjoy the visit.

handbaghoarder Thu 09-Jul-20 12:35:02

Tough call but great advice given above. I have two sets of GC in Asia and one or another set spends every summer holiday and two weeks at Christmas here. Really missing the bedlam and pure joy that they bring but no decision to be made for us. Cant wait for “normal” service to resume. Till then thank heavens for technology. Have a great time.

BBbevan Thu 09-Jul-20 12:35:58

We usually have our 2 GDs in August. They are teenagers now and love shopping. I think DH and I, both now mid 70s, might find trailing round the shops a bit uncomfortable, as we are in the vulnerable category. We will talk to ourDS soon and see what happens

Greyjoy1953 Thu 09-Jul-20 12:45:16

With great trepidation I had my grandchildren to stay last night, one 6 (at school) and the other one 10 (not allowed) and I must say it gave me and my husband such joy to have them. They went home this morning but they are both keen to do it again. Before lockdown we looked after them 3 days a week and they stayed over one. We are not going back to that yet but we shall continue with the sleepover once a week. If you have no overriding symptoms they try, if you feel comfortable continue, if not don’t repeat but the rewards are endless if you do.
Hope this helps you make a decision and hopefully I have posted on right entry whoops!!!

Ajl99 Thu 09-Jul-20 13:07:44

The rules say no at the moment. Even though I think they’re illogical, the only way we’ve managed this is not to make a personal choice about which ones to break and which not. Otherwise we’re no different to Cummings. Also my DIL is an infectious diseases doc and cannot break the rules so we can’t have our 10 month old granddaughter to stay as there’s no possibility of social distancing.

Juniper1 Thu 09-Jul-20 13:09:42

Thanks for all your thoughts. I think testing takes too long to provide a result by which time, including travelling time to us, may nor longer be accurate.
I am not thinking of the government advice, they are ineffective in this.
I am usually able to think decisions through effectively. This one is stumping me. And seems to require an ability to foretell the future!

chattykathy Thu 09-Jul-20 14:00:29

Test results can come back in less than 24 hours so that might be a good way forward. My DD was feeling fatigued and light headed so entered these symptoms into the Covid 19 study app and they suggested she had the test. Got the results in less than 20 hours.

Bazza Thu 09-Jul-20 15:00:19

Personally I would do it like a shot if you’re not vulnerable. I’m so confused and bored with the rules that keep changing, I’m just being sensible and doing what feels right.

justwokeup Thu 09-Jul-20 17:37:58

OH has been shielding and we thought the rule was that we can extend our 'bubble' to our AC's family from 1 August. They also seem to be under the same impression and they are def a rules- and health-conscious couple. I've already been asked to continue helping with school run and to babysit in Aug so I'm confident we are correct! grin

newnanny Thu 09-Jul-20 18:44:51

I would say yes. Swimming pools and gyms opening by end of July.

Eloethan Thu 09-Jul-20 19:32:30

There has been so much loosening of "the rules", mostly to accommodate business (which, to some extent, is understandable as people's jobs are at risk) and so much confusion that, if I were you, I would do whatever you and the children's parents think best.

We are helping out with our grandchildren now. Otherwise it could be months before it is declared completely "safe" to do so - and then we are told the virus might well flare up again or be replaced by 'flu. At some point, and bearing in mind our own personal and health circumstances, we have to get back to some form of normality, whilst still taking extra care with hygiene, unnecessary close contact with people outside the family, etc.

Bluecat Thu 09-Jul-20 19:46:08

I wouldn't do it, to be honest. We used to have our grandkids to sleep over, on a very regular basis, but we don't do it now. We see them in the garden but no hugging. It's upsetting (I had a little cry about it the other day) but you have to stay safe. How would your kids and grandkids feel if either of you caught it and died? Or, even if you survived, if it had a lasting impact on your health?

The facts as we are given them are not scaremongering. In fact, they are the opposite. We were told to stay 2 metres apart, then 1 metre was okay in some circumstances... and the possibility of aerosolised microparticles has been known about from the beginning. I know, because I remember my DD telling her dad about the possible risk of aerosolised particles coming through air conditioning systems, when she was trying to make him understand how dangerous the virus was going to be, back in early March. She said then that research showed that the safe distance between people was 27 foot. Latest research says the particles can travel 10 metres just through breathing. I am pointing this out to suggest that, far from scaremongering, the risks are being downplayed. For instance, there is medical evidence that suggests that the effects on long-term health from a mild attack of Covid-19 can be potentially serious.

Basically, the scientists and doctors know more about this illness than they did, but they still don't fully understand it. It does not just attack the lungs but can affect the heart, brain, blood and so on. We minimise the risks at our peril.

Of course, we want to shield our little ones from harm, and we should not underestimate the possible harm that the virus could do to their health, but we are the ones who are mainly in the firing line. Once you are over 50, your immune system isn't so effective. Most of us on here are at an age where, even without underlying illnesses, we are at risk. You might feel fit and sprightly but your body just can't fight infection like it did when you were young.

It's a rotten situation to be in, when you can't be close to the people you love. I know that some people will take that risk. I am tempted to throw caution to the wind, put my arms around my grandchildren and invite them to stay. Then I think of being parted from them forever, and I don't want to make that happen sooner than it must. Nor do I want to lose my husband, because men, of course, are even more vulnerable. You have to take these things into account.