I think it depends on your subjecct and I have happily quoted Wikipedia in academic essays. DS is an academic and will accept Wikipedia references.
As with any reference material it needs to be checked and corroborated. It is preferable to plagiarism - just taking the Wikipedia reference, changing the language and making no attribution.
As I said, I think the problems with the veracity of Wikipedia have been exaggerated, most of the people who did the changes, have moved on to much more exciting topics, like fake news and conspiracy theories. The website now has millions of entries and for most ordinary purposes is reliable.
Remember it was the respectable and academically approved journal, The Lancet, that published and then withdrew Andrew Wakefield's false research project on the links between vaccination and autism - and it is not the only peer-reviewed journal to have published and later withdrawn articles that were proven to be deliberately mendacious.
I was recently researching a couple of obscure local worthies who died about 100 years ago and led lives of Victorian rectitude. I knew the source of the entries, already knew something about their lives and really doubt that anyone went into their entries and changed their education details and names of their wives and children.