My history at school was dull and rather bitty. The Angles Saxons and Jutes, the Romans, Pitt the Younger, The Kings and Queens, the Industrial and Agrarian Revolutions, Suez and Trade.
I remember, like Iam64, the endless maps with arrows. There was always someone sweeping armies around the world! And then there was the British Empire.
Much of this was greedy and ridiculous to me - and I do not remember any of it with anything like pleasure. It was deeply dull. I could never understand the need for invasion anywhere so a lot of it seemed pointless.
We spent some time on the 1st and second world wars (not as much as they do now, that's for sure) - we were told to read "The Diary of Anne Frank" as homework. This was quite enlightened I think now.
I wonder if I might have found the whole thing more interesting if we has been reading more novels set in different times. Getting in people's heads was not a priority - the priority was dates and places, people's names and so on.
I don't honestly know what would have interested me as a child history-wise if not more "story". I think some of us need more understanding of people and a feel for time to make more sense of things.
I now find a lot of if interesting. I am moved at ruins or archeological sites - at places where people lived and worked, where they died for their beliefs or fought a cause.
The idea that other people with similar loves and fears and reason trod this earth before us, is deeply deeply moving. That ancient peoples made the most extraordinary discoveries is exciting and eye-opening. The thought that what is important to me today will be gone in the proverbial blink of an eye has meaning now.
I also think I need to feel man's inhumanity to man in order to engage fully with the power struggles, oppression and injustices. This came with age and my own "lived experience" as we now say (though I loathe this phrase). I think I'm very driven both by my heart and understanding of the way power works as far as history is concerned.