But does she? Really? Not sure three articles from a South African online 'news' site, using some pictures of her Maj that are older than me and listing every time she gave out a prize or had to turn up at a frilly frock do are proof of insidious corruption and nefarious dealings.
The cousins had learning difficulties, not dementia I believe. What they have to do with her Maj is that she was led to believe that they had died, when they hadn't. When the story broke way back, like everything else tenuously connected to the RF that's a bit 'off' it was used as a stick to beat them with.
My guess is that the Queen is more sinned against than sinning when it comes to Arabic dudes subjugating their wives and daughters, as in she is not complicit. Just potentially 'guilty' by association? I meant are we talking sweaty pictures with schoolgirls in the home of Epstein guilty by association, or giving a cup at a horse race and being a the same banquet along with 100 other people guilty by association?
Does anyone know that she has encouraged close contact since the incident with the kidnapping? Genuine question because I have no idea.
He never gives up being stupid.
