Gransnet forums

Chat

Megan and Harry again!

(1001 Posts)
Newatthis Sun 21-Feb-21 12:15:54

Can someone please enlighten me in letting me know what was wrong in Harry and meghan saying "service is universal"? Surely it is. We also like to help each other and provide a service to each other when we can, that's what I'd like to believe anyway. Isn't this what they meant? There's seems to be a lot of H & M bashing again over this, however, it's all gone quiet over Prince Andrew's alleged sexual relationship with an underage girl. Am I missing something?

Smileless2012 Mon 22-Feb-21 09:49:39

As far as I'm aware that's correct Nell. He couldn't retain his offices and roles once he was no longer a working member of the RF. Something he must have known when the decision was made.

Polarbear2 Mon 22-Feb-21 09:54:04

It couldn’t be the media that’s spun this to look bad could it ????

GrannyGravy13 Mon 22-Feb-21 10:01:02

Absolutely Polarbear2 ??

NellG Mon 22-Feb-21 10:03:27

Just trying to pour oil on troubled waters Merlot - Just with the word stripped I imagine her marching in, ripping off H's medals, squirting ketchup on M's pristine white dress, ripping a sleeve off and showing them the door, via the servants entrance. wink

Polarbear2 Mon 22-Feb-21 10:21:17

NellG ???.

trisher Mon 22-Feb-21 10:28:13

It seemed quite a reasonable statement to me. An offer to remain a support to the organisations they once held official roles in. Perhaps that's why only the last few words have been reproduced. That wouldn't sit well with the image of uncaring individuals
As evidenced by their work over the past year, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain committed to their duty and service to the UK and around the world, and have offered their continued support to the organisations they have represented regardless of official role.
We can all live lives of service. Service is universal.

NellG Mon 22-Feb-21 10:34:20

Nah, sorry trisher what ever way I look at it that last line was completely unnecessary. It's the kind of thing I would add if I was being sarcastic - or someone would add if they were being passive aggressive. Other than that it serves zero purpose because their intention has already been stated.

trisher Mon 22-Feb-21 10:44:52

I might agree NellG if they hadn't been told originally-that for them it was "not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service".
So not surprisingly they said "yes they could"

maddyone Mon 22-Feb-21 10:45:04

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex remain committed to their duty and service to the UK.......

I cannot imagine any way at all that Harry and Meghan are performing any duties or services to anyone or any organisation in the UK.

maddyone Mon 22-Feb-21 10:46:42

Ooops, posted before I meant to.

So if anyone can point out to me the duties or services they are performing, or indeed in the light of Covid, will perform in the future, I’ll be happy to understand more than I understand now.

Smileless2012 Mon 22-Feb-21 10:49:09

"As evidenced by their work over the past year" does anyone know what they've done in terms of "their duty and service to the UK and around the world"?

Genuine question by they way.

eazybee Mon 22-Feb-21 11:05:43

Sarah48
I have just seen your post about the tape of the conversation between Charles and Camilla.
What possible relevance does it have to the matter under discussion, and why would anyone go to the trouble of typing out a transcript of a private conversation, even though it is now in the public domain, then posting it.
What sort of person are you?

NellG Mon 22-Feb-21 11:11:29

trisher I see your point - I read that as not possible to continue with their roles as they were bestowed as part of the services provided by working members of the RF. (that was a mouthful...!)

I think the interpretation of what public service is means very different things inside and outside of the RF.

NellG Mon 22-Feb-21 11:15:13

Smiles absolutely no idea - unless irritating the bejaysus out of people is now a public service?

wink

Ellianne Mon 22-Feb-21 11:15:48

Calendargirl your re-telling
this morning of the 2018 wedding was interesting. Yes, heaven and earth were moved to accommodate the pair's wishes, but it was not to be the stuff of which fairy tales are made. They had everything they wanted, but didn't somewhere Meghan later reduce the occasion to being an exercise in attracting tourism? Very ungrateful.

Ellianne Mon 22-Feb-21 11:21:32

I cannot imagineanyway at all that Harry and Meghan are performing any duties or services to anyone or any organisation in the UK.
Maybe maddyone in some warped and stupid way they see the raising of their status in America as being good for UK tourism?!!

Anniebach Mon 22-Feb-21 11:26:28

Not forgetting Megan spent Christmas with the family before they married , no one else has done so. And Harry said they were the family she never had,

She said William and Kate were being so supportive yet in S.A.
complained no had asked if she was ok when pregnant.

As for public service outside of the royal family, the refuge collectors carry out a public service.

Abused women will now be protected from bananas with -
you are strong , you are loved written on them, whilst cameras
were rolling.

trisher Mon 22-Feb-21 11:29:45

Smileless2012

"As evidenced by their work over the past year" does anyone know what they've done in terms of "their duty and service to the UK and around the world"?

Genuine question by they way.

As far as I can see it is only the patronage and titles awarded by the RF that have been removed (I may be wrong about this). But I think Harry remains a patron of the Invictus Games and Meghan is a patron of Smart Works. They. have also given money to sports development and a coach training organisation.

JaneJudge Mon 22-Feb-21 11:35:16

They are right though, service is universal surely? but I am not a fan of the Royals and don't buy into all this stolen Prince nonsense.

Alegrias1 Mon 22-Feb-21 11:42:36

She said William and Kate were being so supportive yet in S.A. complained no had asked if she was ok when pregnant.

This is another stick to beat her with. Tom Bradby asked her how she was doing and if she was OK. She answered him, I thought truthfully, and then thanked him for asking because not many other people had.

So no complaining, no matter how you try to spin it.

JaneJudge Mon 22-Feb-21 11:47:18

I thought she was just honest too, people don't like honesty though, they like people to put on a front and act in a way they find socially acceptable themselves. It is like when people are upset and grieving or <insert any other life changing event> people are far happier if your pain is done in a dignified manner. They don't want snot and tears and ugly. Not that she was ugly but I know what I mean.

Smileless2012 Mon 22-Feb-21 11:48:27

"and then thanked him for asking because not many other people had" well if that wasn't complaining, what is? Why even mention it? How would you "spin it" Alegrias?

Yammy Mon 22-Feb-21 11:48:40

I agree with Anniebach,
Marrying Harry has put her on the world stage. She was a second rate actress who handed out packets of drugs as favours at her first marriage. She saw her opportunity and took it. Some would say good on you girl. But please go and do it quietly and let everyone forget you ever existed like before their marriage. Who cares what they get up to.
Service, however it is given, does not need to be shouted out.
How about the mountain rescue chap who was disabled for life and only mentioned on the local news after going to the rescue of illegal wild campers who have never been named and only fined £200 each. That's service.

NellG Mon 22-Feb-21 11:50:49

Anniebach

^Abused women will now be protected from bananas with -
you are strong , you are loved written on them, whilst cameras
were rolling.^

Best comment all morning! Made me spit my coffee - ?

When this lockdown is over I am going to buy you a drink lady, you are a legend!

Galaxy Mon 22-Feb-21 11:51:17

Yes and I think it was a cultural difference as well. My sister in law is Anerican and she is very open about her feelings, we had a family bereavement last year and watching the difference between the way she expressed herself and the way dh (British, quite reserved) expressed himself was interesting to say the least.

This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion