Gransnet forums

Chat

The National Trust - is it losing ours?

(353 Posts)
MawBe Tue 15-Jun-21 08:27:06

Paw and I took out membership of the NT over 40 years ago do that we could traipse round beautiful old houses and gardens, enjoy superior scones and cakes in their excellent tea rooms and invariably find lovely products and other things to buy in their shops which would guarantee that the Broon But an Ben would gleam like Mentmore Towers. We also felt it was a worthy cause.
For the last few years I have made only occasional use of my membership but still regarded it as a worthwhile charitable donation even if the houses were shut much of the time.
But this latest is stretching my loyalty
The National Trust has told volunteers at an 18th century palace to don face paint and glitter to mark Pride month despite growing backlash from members over its “woke” policies. Volunteers at Ickworth in Suffolk have been encouraged to dress up in colourful clothes, wear rainbow flowers in their hair, wear multi-coloured make-up and have their face or body painted when they turn up at work on Friday.
It is part of celebrations across the National Trust, which is encouraging its properties to support Pride and says on its website that they will be “inviting the teams at our places to wear their rainbow colours ”.
It is not the first time that the charity has been criticised over its requests for staff and volunteers to wear the gay pride symbol. In 2017 it was forced to U-turn on an instruction that those working at Felbrigg Hall in Norfolk who refused to wear rainbow lanyards and badges had to take on backroom roles

Now I am not pro-slavery or indeed intolerant of freedom of sexuality , but WTF (sorry, but I am cross) has this got to do with the original aims of the NT which was “established for the purpose of promoting the permanent preservation for the benefit of the nation of lands, and buildings, of beauty or historic interest and lands for the preservation so far as practical of their natural aspect features and animal and plant life.”
It certainly seems to be losing the plot.

FannyCornforth Wed 16-Jun-21 10:41:40

The Enclosure Acts seemed to take up a large proportion of GCSE History when I did it.

Callistemon Wed 16-Jun-21 10:37:30

I will not bore you with the whole history of enclosure

grin
I'm sure your account wouldn't be boring, M0nica but at school our teacher certainly went on at length teaching us about the Enclosure Acts.
Most of us stayed awake, I think.

Of course, we didn't learn about every single one thoroughly, as there were thousands of various Acts and amendments over centuries.

toscalily Wed 16-Jun-21 10:30:56

MawBe, the "alone Ranger" grin Probably why he hooked up with Tonto.

M0nica Wed 16-Jun-21 08:36:33

I do not remember history st shool being particularly distorted, we covered, slavery learnt about the arab contribution to the Renaissance and the importance of arab culture.

However I am seeing some very strange history on this thread. Yes, in the 17th century in some cases where manor house and village were contigious, villages were demolished and rebuilt on another site. One of most famous exaamples is near where I live and i would think the villagers were very happy moving from a hilltop location with problems over the wateer supply down alongside the main road and with a ready supply of water - and no, the village doesn't flood.

However, enclosure was some thing entirely different and the two are not related,although they may have been done as part of a grand reorganisation of lamb.

Enclosure started in the 16th cnetury when rural populationn had not fully recovered from the Blackdeath....

I will not bore you with the whole history of enclosure.

I would just make the point, just because we disaprove of how history was taught in the past is no justification for making gross distortions of our own.

Rememeber 100 years from now, our view of history and all we are doing now will be widely criticised by our descendents, because that is what always happens.

theworriedwell Wed 16-Jun-21 08:15:32

Talullah

I always wanted to be an Indian when I was a child. Didn't like the cowboys at all.

I did as well. I think the main driver was I wanted that long, straight, shiny black hair. My sister had black hair, I'm ginger. I spent my childhood longing for black hair. I had a bit of a thing for Zorro as well.

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 23:14:06

Normans, Saxons, Viking marauders even, Tudors, Stuarts

Not to mention From Ur to Rome.
Empires come and go
And then the maurauding hordes of Ostrogoths and Visigoths.

Goths are not just a modern concept so perhaps the National Trust could hold a Goth Weekend too?
All volunteers dressed up and Goth music playing in the background.

Talullah Tue 15-Jun-21 22:28:54

Callistemon

Talullah

I always wanted to be an Indian when I was a child. Didn't like the cowboys at all.

Talullah
Probably from learning The Song of Hiawatha at primary school!

Indeed! And watching Last of the Mohicans. Very good TV series from donkey's years ago.

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 22:24:16

For a more up-to-date version there is always the Disney Pocahontas film (possibly the worst film from Disney) but we have to suffer if we want to educate ourselves.

MawBe Tue 15-Jun-21 22:20:21

21st century predictive text has not heard of the Lone Ranger !
Snowflake!

MawBe Tue 15-Jun-21 22:18:55

As said before, cow boys and Indians. I imagine most of our generation were either taught, or learnt through films, TV series and books, etc, that the Indians were the baddies

My education must have been sadly defective as I have no recollection of Cowboys and Indians ever featuring in History lessons. Normans, Saxons, Viking marauders even, Tudors, Stuart’s - but never the alone Ranger and Tonto. . Not even General Custer’s last stand.
Should the NT perhaps be addressing the issues of Native Americans too then?

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 22:16:31

Lisagran

Kali2

Not so sweeping- Capability Brown's green parks were very much linked to the Enclosures, as attached peasant villages looked ugly and were in the way. And then the ahah concept was invented, the parks filled with sheep, and the peasants sent to work for a pittance on the frames and looms- having to spend their pittance on renting said frames- and live in terrible slum conditions.

The history of the Enclosures is so cruel and so deliberate, to find slave labour for the growing industrialisation. Denying that is just nonsense.

My History knowledge is not great, so I may be wrong, but I think one of the concepts attributed to Capability Brown was the introduction of Hahas. I think the concept of ahah is more to do with Alan Partidge grin

Alan Partridge was on Springwatch last week

Ah ha!

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 22:09:40

Talullah

I always wanted to be an Indian when I was a child. Didn't like the cowboys at all.

Talullah
Probably from learning The Song of Hiawatha at primary school!

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 22:07:13

All these things I never knew, despite watching The Lone Ranger and Tonto.

Who knew?!
Tonto never mentioned the Lost Cities.
There were town planners there centuries before Europeans arrived.

Talullah Tue 15-Jun-21 21:58:04

I always wanted to be an Indian when I was a child. Didn't like the cowboys at all.

MawBe Tue 15-Jun-21 21:53:43

Oh I am so glad I provided you with some well deserved entertainment. You are welcome

You never disappoint, Kali2

theworriedwell Tue 15-Jun-21 21:39:28

Sago

theworriedwell You clearly have a gripe with NT and I’m really sorry you had a bad experience.

I had a shocking experience with a pub landlord in a delightful Dales pub yesterday.
We had a drink in the garden after a long hike then asked for more drinks and to see the menu his response was “ you've been sitting there ages why didn’t you ask sooner, you can have nothing hot and we’ve no brown bread, I need your order now”

It was 1.30 and the pub apparently served food until 2.30.

It may have been because we were white, middle class Christian and British.
This would make him a racist.

I think though it was because it was hot, his wife we later learned was off for the day as it was her birthday and he was working under pressure.

Well the NT staff who were rude to us had no such excuse, if they did they wouldn't have been so helpful to the people in front of us, they wouldn't have then ignored us and helped the people behind us or the people behind them, they wouldn't have been rude when I asked if we were invisible and they wouldn't have then refused us the same help as the other customers.
,People have bad days, people get hot, and stressed but sometimes some of them get subjected to discrimination, that sort of explanation or justification or excuse whatever you want to call it, is exactly the reason my husband didn't want me to write a formal complaint because he's heard it for the last 74 years. I've only had it by association for 40 so I'm still a bit naive.

I can understand the landlord knew you were white, not so convinced he would instantly identify you as middle class and Christian. What race was he?

Kali2 Tue 15-Jun-21 21:37:59

And that the history we have been taught at school has been whitewashed and distorted. Probably taught differently to our parents and grandparents- and to our children and grandchildren. Because a ot of it was either hidden, or distorted, from the pov of the 'winners' at a certain time along the timeline. Why should the NT not reflect this, and perhaps even makes us rethink what we were taught.

As said before, cow boys and Indians. I imagine most of our generation were either taught, or learnt through films, TV series and books, etc, that the Indians were the baddies. And yes, they could be really cruel when defending their way of life and sacred territory- but at the end of the day, THEY were wronged.

Kali2 Tue 15-Jun-21 21:34:02

No Calli.

What I said is that I think it is valid to make the link, between history, or histories depending on the angle, and today's society.

Lisagran Tue 15-Jun-21 21:31:24

Blossoming

Lisagran my bad! I totally misread your post! It’s been a long, hot day … grin

Phew, I nearly got stroppy with you there, ha, ha!

Thanks for the apology grin

muffinthemoo Tue 15-Jun-21 18:25:03

I would like the corporations who sat on their hands during the AIDS crisis, the Section 28 protests, the introduction of ‘civil partnerships’, and Section 28 repeal to stop enthusiastically rainbow-washing their corporate identities in 2021 now that it won’t cost them anything to be LGBT allies.

Those of us old enough to have been there at the time know and remember who our allies were, and we know who is just bandwagoning. You know who your real friends are when you are down.

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 18:08:54

The question is 'which history' - the real one or the white washed one we were taught?
Are you saying that all NT history is whitewashed?

I've learnt a lot since I was at school Kali2 and some of it I learned from visits to historical properties (not just NT), belonging to history groups and local societies and researching family histories.

None of that means that I think it is the place of the National Trust to teach us about modern society and culture when the whole point of its existence is to preserve historical properties and to teach us of the true history of those properties.

Thinking it should be teaching us about modern society and culture misses the whole point of its existence.

JaneJudge Tue 15-Jun-21 17:57:33

we have had a situation locally to me where a slave owners statue was put in a prominent place (not in a town square but an area of interest) and people have been asking for it to be taken down and there is lots of 'but he was important to the area' etc
when just down the road the ancestors of an early adopter of the anti slavery live and he has no statue anywhere. In fact there were lots of people in this area who were wealthy land owners who were early adopters of the anti slavery movement

Kali2 Tue 15-Jun-21 17:53:38

The question is 'which history' - the real one or the white washed one we were taught?

Do you think German children are taught the same history as their grand-parents? I can assure you they are not.

So yes, let's be honest without being obsessed, and nought wrong with linking up with the realities of today. Even if it is to say that race and sexual identity were seen, or often, not seen, very differently then.

History does not link in a vacuum.

Do you remember watching cow-boys and Indians films in the 50s - and genuinely believing the Indians were the baddies. I do.

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 17:53:16

Kali2

Ah yes, Priti Patel

Is she a National Trust member?

Otherwise, I'm not sure what she's doing on the thread?
confused

Callistemon Tue 15-Jun-21 17:46:39

Mine too Amberspyglass. I think it’s about time that the National Trust reflected modern society and culture, not just a romantic version of the past which many seem comfortable with.

But why?

That is the essence of what the NT is about - History!

Why on earth should it reflect modern society and culture?
That is for other areas of expertise, other groups!

confused