It's hard to understand why she chose to go on Ellen de Generes after the avalanche of complaints from staff working on her show. Umpteen of those testaments stating that, in spite of her "be kind" mantra she is nothing like her public persona, in fact many saying she is a pretty horrible person. We all know Piers Morgan is prone to run off at the mouth, I think his latest comment pertaining to this appearance was along the line of "maybe they are going to discuss bullying in the workplace" might have struck a note. His former and far more restrained colleague did add recently that it is becoming increasing difficult to defend Meghan. Under the circumstances of the furore that surrounded Meghan's own alleged difficult relations with members of staff, one would imagine she would make the correlation between that and the confirmed reports of the toxic atmosphere on the Ellen show as mouthy Piers pointed out. I believe the programme is coming to a close anyway in the aftermath of how many of her staff disliked being around her.
Given that the royal couple left Britain for a life away from the spotlight, public scrutiny and the royal family, they seem to spend their lives doing the opposite. Once again on this show the collection of words and illustrations that is described as a book was plugged. I can't think of any other children's author who would do that. Julia Donaldson's fantastic books don't have to be plugged she is assured of a captive audience
As Meghan has stated in "her truth" interview how living as a royal brought her to her knees insomuch that she was at times suicidal and finds it hard to disguise her dislike for the institution, it does seem strange there when lobbying senators recently, that she would opt to sign herself off as Meghan Duchess of Sussex, rather than Meghan Markle. I did think that royal titles aren't supposed to be used in such a context. I'm not sure it would carry any weight in America anyway.
