The difference in the UK and US cases was that AH was allowed to present more evidence in the UK abd the UK case was decided on the law by a judge. In the US it was decided by ordinary jurors - this is what I understood.
Here's one of many articles about it:
www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61673676.amp
People who smell bad on the bus
How do you rebuild trust after it has been broken?
How can *anybody* still see this man as any kind of statesman or world leader?



