biglouis
Rather ironic that Dr Harold Shipman (who is believed to have killed over 200 people) often put "old age" on the death certificates of his patients. In most cases they were people much younger than the queen with most of them leading active lives. Yet the verdict "old age" was never questioned until the alarm was raised and his activities became public knowledge. When you think that if someone dies age 96 their heart has been beating for all that time. Organs do, in time, wear out!
I was just going to say that I thought that putting 'old age' as a cause of death had been outlawed because of Shipman.
As for making causes of public, I don't like it, although I understand the reasons why it happens. We all know that Elvis died eating a burger on the toilet, and (to me) that is too much information. How undignified for him, and for his loved ones. I have read things in the media about people's deaths with information that was, IMO unnecessary - again for reasons of dignity.
Similarly, if someone dies of a stigmatised illness (eg syphilis or alcoholism) why should the neighbours have to know? We protect health records in life, why not in death? Unless there is good reason to publicise cause of death I would prefer it to remain private, although I can see that secrecy might protect people in cases of neglect or malpractice. 'Natural Causes', or 'Old Age' should usually be enough.