Gransnet forums

Chat

The best age to start a family?

(55 Posts)
nanna8 Fri 28-Oct-22 23:56:00

Nowadays ,with rising costs, some couples are waiting much longer before they have children. It wasn’t unusual to have children very young when we married. I can see advantages both ways. - energy being the obvious one when you are young yourself and the ability to get down and really play ( and the desire to ). On the other hand you have more stability and a higher living standard when you are a bit older. One of my grandchildren had a baby at a very young age and she said she couldn’t find anything in common with many of the other mums she met, they were too ‘old’. Another daughter waited until she was almost 40 and she is a different sort of mum, a lot wiser but perhaps a bit more fussy .

Hithere Sat 29-Oct-22 00:10:35

Sadly, I dont think we can choose that

It depends on having the right partner, for example

ElaineI Sat 29-Oct-22 00:38:10

I don't think there is a best age. Some mothers are very young, some mothers forward their career first then start a family and some mothers for whatever reason are older and more established in their career, housing etc. All are mostly wonderful mothers and might have different views on child raising but there is no right or wrong age to begin and as long as children are loved and nurtured then it is right for them.

Calendargirl Sat 29-Oct-22 07:05:41

Had my first child at 21. Quite young for nowadays, but this was nearly 50 years ago. My own parents married late and were an ‘old’ mum and dad, but not by today’s standards. I always wanted to have my family when young.

So glad that was what happened. Am pleased to have older GC now, unlike some of my contemporaries who are just starting on that route. My DH and I have time for ourselves and our interests, we did the babysitting and school runs years ago. Enjoyed it, but wouldn’t want to go back.

sodapop Sat 29-Oct-22 07:15:01

It's the same for me Calendargirl I am pleased to have had children and grandchildren whilst I was relatively young. My grandchildren are in their twenties and thirties now whilst many of my friends still have a lot of child care responsibilities for their grandchildren.
I don't think there is any right or wrong time just how life pans out often.

tanith Sat 29-Oct-22 07:16:57

I’m happy I had my children early now I have wonderful grown up GC having had many happy times with them as they grew and now I’ve less energy I am enjoying time and making memories with Great GC.
But each to their own timetable and circumstance.

Greyduster Sat 29-Oct-22 07:44:35

There’s no right or wrong age. I had my children early - the first born when I was twenty one. By the time they had completed their education and flown the nest, we still had plenty of physical and mental energy. I was born late to parents who thought their child rearing days were finished and they had run out of both! DD had our grandson when she was in her mid thirties, and many of her friends did the same, choosing to settle career and housing ladder issues in advance of any children. Autres temps, autres moeurs.

Esspee Sat 29-Oct-22 07:59:02

I am working on my family tree and am constantly amazed at just how many children my ancestors had and mostly lived to a good age.
Today so many women, by putting off having children, end up having to get assistance to start their families.
I think it is clear that our race was meant to have children early so I suggest mid twenties as being possibly the best time

ginny Sat 29-Oct-22 08:00:55

I had my three when I was 23, 26 and just 30. iItwas still usual in the 70s early 80s
Eldest DD had her one son at the age of 24 which made me a fairly young Grandmother of 48.
Our other two DGSs were born when DD3 was 32 and 37. She lost three babies in between.
I was happy to have mychildren whenI did but circumstances are different for everyone.
Speaking as Grandmother I certainly had more energy when DGS1 was small ( now 20) than I do now with the two who are 6 and 18 months.

Humbertbear Sat 29-Oct-22 08:08:26

I had my first child when I was 21. We had already been married for 4 years. All of that would be very unusual today. I went to university when my youngest started school and had a successful and busy career. I’m pleased that I was a relatively young grandmother who can take the children for day’s out. DS is in his late forties and still has three young children. When I was that age, my children had already finished university. But there is no right age, it depends on meeting the right person and having the finances.

GagaJo Sat 29-Oct-22 08:54:27

I had my child young. I'm glad I did, because I'm a young granny to my DGS. My (much older) bloke had his late. He was a long way into retirement with still dependent children. Definitely not a good thing, emotionally, energy wise or finanacially.

There's a reason infertility is an issue now. Many women are losing their fertility by their very late 30s/40s.

I really like the Chinese system. Couples have their children young. By mid-20s. Grandparents retire in mid-50s and do the childcare. Strong family bonds. Parents can work.

Oopsadaisy1 Sat 29-Oct-22 09:01:42

We were married for 2 years then had our first daughter when I was 20, my Mum was 30 when she had me and I wanted to have ours when we were young. But MzOops was 30 when she had our GCs who are now almost 19 and 17, it was hoped that we could enjoy life when MrOops retired, but he worked on until he was 70 and due to MissOops ill health we haven’t enjoyed it that much!

Still mustn’t grumble! They were and are a constant delight and although we were so hard up back then I wouldn’t change anything.

karmalady Sat 29-Oct-22 09:03:19

23 an my husband was 24. It was the done thing then and looking back was absolutely right for us. We had plenty of energy for the children, for saving and make do and mend, for pets and for hobbies like walking and camping. I would not have changed anything, I was also able to study further for more qualifications. Having the children early did not really impact my career, it did impact my pension but so be it

Then they they went to uni and started their own careers and afterwards we were young enough to save for old age, while having couple time and a few exotic holidays. Now enjoying a good rapport with teenage grandchildren

Casdon Sat 29-Oct-22 09:05:28

I think we all think the age we were when we had our own children was the right age!

henetha Sat 29-Oct-22 10:01:11

No particular age; everyone's circumstances are different.
It would seem a good idea to be financially established at least, but love takes over and babies arrive, whenever.
I was 22 and my husband 26 when we had our first son.

Parsley3 Sat 29-Oct-22 10:24:08

Women who want to have a large family can have their first baby in their teens and the last one in their 40s. Any age is the ideal age for an individual.

Redhead56 Sat 29-Oct-22 10:24:17

I married at 26 had a full time job I enjoyed bought our first house I was happy doing well.
Out of the blue Mother Nature hit me I was desperate for a baby. Family and friends around me seemed to get pregnant easily some were not happy.
I was very concerned the only help I got at the time was temperature charts. Three years later after spending the whole pregnancy in an antenatal ward my precious son was born. I don’t think there is a best age it happens when it does.

Zoejory Sat 29-Oct-22 10:25:46

Physically it's probably better to have a baby in your 20s.

nanna8 Sat 29-Oct-22 10:51:35

One of my grandchildren has 3 babies and she is only 21. I have to envy her her 30 minute labours but not the hard work for her and her husband! None of her little ones are good sleepers but luckily my daughter is a really hands on grandma and only in her early 40 s.

Redhead56 Sat 29-Oct-22 10:52:22

I meant to add I was thirty one.

M0nica Sat 29-Oct-22 11:13:19

It is as long as a piece of string. I come from a maternal line that have tended to marry late, relative to the times they lived in, and have children in their late 20s - 30s.

It suited me, I wanted to get my career established before I gave up work, as I had to in my era (early 1970s). I am also happy that I was not a grandparent until my mid 60s. I have been just as fit as younger grandparents to do all the strenuous things that grandparents seem expected to do these days and haven't had to juggle grandchildren and DH and I still working, especially as my grand children live 200 miles away.

But each chooses what best suits them and having children relatively late has served my family well for several generations.

Chardy Sat 29-Oct-22 11:17:57

First in late 20s (higher ed and career established), 2nd mid-30s.
DGD arrived as I was retiring.

JenniferEccles Sat 29-Oct-22 11:35:43

Although I can understand the reasons why, those women who wait until their late thirties or early forties to start a family are taking a huge gamble as it’s well publicised that our fertility drops sharply by the mid thirties and continues to tail off.

Obviously there are many reasons to delay, finding the right man for a start, but I do fear that lots of women, even those who have found ‘the one’ prioritise their career only to find that they’ve leftover it too late for motherhood.

It must be heartbreaking.

Kirsty Alsopp has been quoted as saying that women should start their families in their twenties to avoid the heartbreak of missing out, and I agree, although of course it’s not always that simple.

Norah Sat 29-Oct-22 12:32:41

I was 17 with our first daughter, late 30s with our last.
I was about 40 with first GC, near 60 with first GGC.

Katie59 Sat 29-Oct-22 12:55:13

Physically the best age is in your 20s that has not changed, a couple of years either side does not really make a difference. Its not that simple because women have careers and all sorts of other lifestyle choices they make.

I had mine in my 20s and continued a Nursing career straight through, it’s possible to do the same today in many careers, probably more difficult with careers where 5 day 9-5 routine is expected.