Not a class system, but, like the American, one based on money.
But again, even then only in broad groupings. The third of the population on the lowest incomes have a very different lifestyle to the middle third and different again from the top third.
But each group contains so many different groups of people. The lowest third contains many students and new graduates, probably in only temporary poverty as well as eldely people who have livd in poverty all their lives. In between those extreme end groups ar hundreds of other groups, single parents etc.
Mid group incomes include better off pensioners, young people in well paid jobs, professional families with mid group incomes. living anywhere from new estates, Victorian terraces and interwar semis. theupper class contains popstars, premier league footballers and the landed , or not landed gentry.
Speak to almost anyone in the middle and higher income groups and you will find their parents or grandparents started life in manual or other jobs. My grandparents start life variously as a factory machinist, shop assistant, agricultural labourer and London docker.
Yes, we have social divisions, but they are money not background based. of course the upper inccome have their objectionable steroetypes like Rees Mobb, but at the other end of the line you have have Mike Lynch and other posturing Union leaders who pretend they are one of the under class while receiving middle class salaries. You will get these anywhere, but look atus en masse and class doesn't exist as a social divider, but money does.
As the MSM cannot resist calling out Tommy Robinson’s real name, why does Polanski get a free pass?
What do you find yourself avoiding more as you get older?




