NanKate
A month or so ago I posted on GN an experience I had had earlier this year.
We had collected my grandson from a small park where he had been playing football with some friends. This was on the outskirts of a small town in West Sussex. Whilst DH was driving I looked out of the car window and saw 3 shops set back off the road. In the middle was an antiques shop with the door open and and a brass coal scuttle at the front and a broom. I immediately said to DH ‘there’s an antiques shop there that I would like to visit sometime’. The following day I dropped my DGS off at school in the same village and decided I would visit the antiques shop. I walked up the road and to my surprise there was no row of shops just a housing estate. Very odd. 🤔
Someone from GN kindly sent me some photos online of that village in the 1950s but I couldn’t find those shops, even though they had been so clear for me to see.
I was quite unnerved by the episode.
Please don't be unnerved by this episode.
The rational explanation would be that you had once seen a photo of this place, or some place like it where there was an antique shop. Our brains store a lot of information that we rarely, perhaps, never conciously access. You may have accessed information in your brain that you had never realised you had.
The less rational explanation could be, that some of those who can see or feel the past, can also see and experience the future. This is, obviously, far harder to "prove" than that we can experience the past.
Walking home with mý mother from the theatre one evening we crossed the City Hall Square in Copenhagen, as it was on our direct route from the Royal Theatre, where we had been, to my flat.
As we approached the square, my mother exclaimed; "Oh, look, there is a train in the middle of the City Hall Square!" When I looked there was nothing unusual there, and certainly no train, and my mother admitted that she must have seen something that was not there.
The strange thing about this is that when the city of Copenhagen started making the underground , there was a lot of discussion as to whether a station should or should not be built under the City Hall square. Finally, it was agreed not to build it.
Then a year or two later one of the largest daily papers brought a photo on their front page of a train that had submerged partially, bang in the middle of the square. The date being April 1st most people realised it was a photo-shopped picture.
You could say this was pure coincidence, but did my mother somehow about 10 years prior to the Metro and this joke tune in to either the one or the other discussion?