In todays DT Douglas Murray wrote an interesting article about the implications of calling someone “a racist”. If you defame another individual by calling them a “Paedophile” there is the legal route to accuse them of telling a lie that can be disproven. However, if you call a person “racist” that term is purely subjective and you have no recourse to legal justice. Douglas Murray recounts what happened to Laurence Fox on Question Time when a female in the audience said that the UK is racist. Lauence Fox said he disagreed and that Britain was “a lovely country” and it was not true.
That marked the total destruction of Laurence Fox’s career. He became persona non grata and is now politically engaged in politics.and his views may very much be thought unpalatable by many people. However, it seems grossly unfair to me that any mischief maker can accuse any famous member of society of being racist and there is no legal way to disprove such an allegation. This awful label can destroy another persons stature in society. I have no way of finding out the identity of Fox’s accuser, but surely as a matter of.fairness this is a dreadful, accusation made with no objective truth?
What do other grans think?
Everything in the DT seems to be behind a paywall so I have not provided a link.
Good Morning Monday 20th April 2026


