Most of the objections to the racism accusation have been about me personally which further weakens the argument.
A case I think of "Don't shoot the messenger"
'She's not the messenger, she's a very naughty girl/person/poster!'
No, the objections are not to you personally, but to the way you twist comments, assume that correlation = causation and see racism where it is not there. I don't know for whom you think you are carrying messages, but if my colour is relevant, so is yours, surely? And I am not speaking for anyone other than myself - I don't presume to be the messenger for others.
My opinions are as follows:
Male-bodied people should not be allowed to compete in women's sport.
Having a lifestyle that is more usual from women than men in your culture is not reason to allow male-bodied people to compete in female sport.
Testing for maleness is not connected to racism, and that would hold true even if more black people are discovered to fail the tests.
If white people are also tested and treated the same if they pass or fail the tests, then it is not racism.
There will be black people who agree with me and white people who don't. This is true of any given subject, and their agreement or otherwise is not connected to their race.
Being black does not give someone better insight into fairness in women's sport, and their beliefs on this topic are no more or less valuable than those of white people - their colour is irrelevant.
I am not saying, and have never said that the points of view of others do not exist.
I may have forgotten something, but that feels like a fairly accurate summary of my beliefs on the matter, with which you are, of course, free to agree or disagree, but I would be obliged if you would stop misrepresenting what I am saying.