maddyone
Telephone appointments are an efficient use of time, more people are treated through telephone appointments.
Or we could all go face to face and find it even harder to get an appointment.
For some conditions and requirements - and for some people - telephone appointments are an excellent utilisation of time.
But obviously there are times when a doctor physically needs to look at a patient who might be complaining of a symptom that appears superficially minor, but could indicate something far more serious.
For those who are elderly and maybe not so medically 'well-educated' or have complex medical conditions, I think a F2F appointment is essential.
My local surgery is struggling financially, so badly in fact that they've petitioned Parliament and are asking that we, patients, write to our MP, individually.
Four doctors have resigned, and the surgery cannot afford to replace them.
The number of people wanting to see a GP is rising - all the time - and the number of qualified GPs is dropping.
It isn't just a matter of funding - the pool of clinicians is being drained. There aren't enough GPs and, according to one of them at my surgery, they are overwhelmed with paperwork.
And, as long as this continues, so will the increase in those attending A&E.
Perhaps, instead of going for the low-hanging-fruit - the disabled and sick - to rally the troops, Sunak should have instead focused on this issue which affects millions of people, and causes chaos up and down the country's hospitals' A&E and other departments.
"The NHS is safe with us". Well, it isn't. And quite likely to become even less safe. We will end up with it being a 'safety net' only with ever-expanding holes in the safety net.