Gransnet forums

Chat

Sick of celebrities

(162 Posts)
Elless Sat 20-Apr-24 09:08:19

I know some will say 'read a better class of newspaper' but the papers this morning may as well be renamed the Taylor Swift Diaries. I don't enjoy politics and like to read light hearted news but I'm sick of reading about the Beckhams flaunting their wealth, the Kardashians latest child, who's nepo baby is succeeding at what, etc 😠

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 13:04:13

There is a letter in The Daily Mail magazine today agreeing with you re Bradley's son Bluebelle.

Skydancer Sat 20-Apr-24 13:04:54

I am not the slightest bit interested in any celebrities and, until last week, I didn't know who Taylor Swift was. And now I do know, I couldn't care less.

Sarnia Sat 20-Apr-24 13:11:21

Anyone who has appeared for 5 minutes on Gogglebox or these awful reality shows consider themselves a celebrity these days. I pass by all the newspapers and magazines who have 'celebrities' splashed over the front page. If the Kardashians and their ilk are role models for our young girls, then heaven help us.

silverlining48 Sat 20-Apr-24 13:11:26

My gd looovvvees Taylor swift . I had never heard of her before then, ( gd coukdnt believe it!).
I still don’t know any of her songs, she coukdnt believe that either, so she’s clearly very popular and super super wealthy. Second only to Elon Musk I heard. Not surprising considering the cost of tickets, đŸŽ«

Gala Sat 20-Apr-24 13:13:30

The clue is in the title Anniebach. That's exactly what they are - pointless.😬

I'm also sick of what look to be interesting documentaries being fronted by 'celebrities' who make it all about them... no doubt at the instigation of producers/directors who seem to think it's what we want. Well I don't.

Anniebach Sat 20-Apr-24 13:21:21

Galaso true - pointless

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 13:25:45

My husband said to me once, 'Anything on BBC1 now?'. I said 'Pointless Celebrities.' He said 'Yes I know they are but what's on BBC1?'

RunaroundSue Sat 20-Apr-24 13:27:34

I totally agree. I too am fed up with what the newspapers call news when it is all about so called celebrities. I have stopped buying newspapers and instead just go online and read the headlines but there again, it is all about so called celebs.

They would be totally insignificant if silly people didn't go watch their shows, join their vlogs, blogs whatever they call them these days. I wonder how long they would last if everyone ignored them.

Calendargirl Sat 20-Apr-24 13:30:51

silverlining48

My gd looovvvees Taylor swift . I had never heard of her before then, ( gd coukdnt believe it!).
I still don’t know any of her songs, she coukdnt believe that either, so she’s clearly very popular and super super wealthy. Second only to Elon Musk I heard. Not surprising considering the cost of tickets, đŸŽ«

I haven’t a clue about any of her songs, except one, ‘Love Story’, which I think she wrote when she was 17. Based on Romeo and Juliet.

It’s really good, I think, with a great video. Taylor is very pretty in it.

My 16 year old GD is a big fan, I think.

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 13:31:40

Mond you, I was obsessed with the pop stars of the '60s so I'm being a hypocrite

Germanshepherdsmum Sat 20-Apr-24 13:44:06

So was I. It’s allowed when you’re young - and they were in a different league to some of today’s ‘celebrities’.

Callistemon21 Sat 20-Apr-24 14:12:57

Kate1949

Mond you, I was obsessed with the pop stars of the '60s so I'm being a hypocrite

Were they always a main item on the news every day, though?

Urmstongran Sat 20-Apr-24 15:07:22

L’il Miss on our verandah just now looking out for mummy’s car saw a bus go past and said “look grandma Taylor Swift the Eros Tour” (poster on bus). She’s seven and her older brother tells me she’s a real ‘Swiftie’ asking Alexa to play her songs “all the time”!
đŸ€Ł

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 15:11:13

*Callistemon. The Beatles were in the news a lot. Thankfully grin

Callistemon21 Sat 20-Apr-24 15:12:21

Kate1949

*Callistemon. The Beatles were in the news a lot. Thankfully grin

Oh yes!

Or, as my older cousin called them "Those Beatles you like so much" 😁

Callistemon21 Sat 20-Apr-24 15:14:15

Elvis has landed on British soil!!

Chestnut Sat 20-Apr-24 15:49:44

Skydancer

I am not the slightest bit interested in any celebrities and, until last week, I didn't know who Taylor Swift was. And now I do know, I couldn't care less.

We are all agreed, but Taylor Swift is HUGELY popular and seems to inspire as much adoration as the Beatles in 1964. So 60 years on Beatlemania has become Swiftmania. The internet does magnify everything and mass hysteria even more so.

She has apparently just released a double album of tracks all about her ex boyfriends. There is another singer (British) who is suddenly very popular called Raye. Both of them are singing songs which include the f-word and are angry, bitter and aggressive. These songs are not suitable for children, who will not understand the hateful feelings and emotions expressed in them. Yet children are hearing them.

It makes me weep because popular music was never really suitable for children but they were never exposed to it as much as they are now. All the fun and joy has been sucked out of it. Instead of songs about love and peace we are now hearing songs about hate and bitterness and broken relationships. That is the music of today and that is what our children are hearing.

When I was 12 I was listening to The Springfields singing Island of Dreams.
'High in the sky is a bird on the wing....please carry me with you'.
So innocent.

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 16:11:58

I know I'm biased but I don't think Beatlemania has turned into Swiftmania. I recently saw film of The Beatles' first visit to Australia. It was pandemonium. Hundreds of thousands lined the streets. People were in trees, on buildings. There was a crowd in a square that was so massive that it appeared to move as one. It's on YouTube Beatles in Australia 1964. I'm not sure Taylor has caused such mania, although I could be wrong as I've never taken much notice of her. However, I get your point Chestnut. She is the next new 'thing'.

Chestnut Sat 20-Apr-24 16:20:28

Kate1949 From what I've read she is causing every bit as much mania, but don't forget people can see her through their phones etc. and don't always have to turn up in person. There was even a mention that she could swing the next election if she posts something online.

Kate1949 Sat 20-Apr-24 16:26:26

Really? I'm out of touch with all that malarkey. Good luck to her. To my knowledge I've never heard anything by her. I'll have to have a listen.

Lexisgranny Sat 20-Apr-24 16:35:08

I assume that Nepo babies are those whose parents were ‘in the business’ and only got their jobs through nepotism.

The two expressions that really annoy me are ‘legend’ and ‘ national treasure’ they seem to relate mainly to actors who have been in soaps, which I don’t watch anyway.

I must admit I find the love lives of people in the entertainment business incredibly boring. ( Memo to self, you sound like a miserable old git
)

JamesandJon33 Sat 20-Apr-24 17:55:26

I never know who most of them are anyway.

harold Sat 20-Apr-24 18:29:14

We don't read the Daily Mail articles about celebrities but enjoy (sometimes with gritted teeth) many of their other articles and the sporting and puzzle sections.

winterwhite Sat 20-Apr-24 20:35:43

What makes a person a ‘celebrity’? Being talked about without having done very much?

flappergirl Sat 20-Apr-24 20:44:07

I'm truly puzzled by the amount of space given to Taylor Swift in the Daily Mail. I think there were 4 or 5 separate ones this morning. I can understand one article perhaps announcing a big concert in the UK but this is saturation.

Her fans are mainly teenagers and I find it hard to believe they are reading this or any other newspaper for that matter. They have their own sources such as TikTok, YouTube etc. So the question remains, who are these articles appealing to?