There are video clips on YouTube that show Harry being booed when he went into the cathedral/ church.
Good Morning Tuesday 28th July 2926
Seems a bit harsh? All that way too. He landed in the UK a few hours ago. Without Meghan and the children.
From the Telegraph just now:
“ The Duke of Sussex will not meet the King this week, the Telegraph can reveal.
Prince Harry, 39, landed in London on Tuesday morning and had made no secret of his hopes to see his father during his visit.
But a spokesperson for the Duke said: “In response to the many inquiries and continued speculation on whether or not The Duke will meet with his father while in the UK this week, it unfortunately will not be possible due to His Majesty’s full programme.
“The Duke of course is understanding of his father’s diary of commitments and various other priorities and hopes to see him soon.”
I just think if the King doesn't ’find time’ to see his son then Harry might well just think ‘sod it’ next time/if he comes over.
I know Harry bad mouthed the family in his book ‘Spare’ but still …
What do you think?
There are video clips on YouTube that show Harry being booed when he went into the cathedral/ church.
What do you think of his interviews and his book, nadateturbe? The lies which were told and the insults to his family?
Yes, Joseanne, frumpy is the only word.
With you Nada Despite his privilege he has had a lot to deal with in childhood as I mentioned before. That leaves a mark through adulthood.
I don’t understand why there is so much vitriol round him and his wife. Nothing they do affects any of us so why the constant negativity. I am sure he’s a perfectly ok bloke, with faults as we all have.
The news footage of Harry arriving shows, and the commentator talks of, the cheers he receives. www.google.com/search?q=harry+arrives+at+st+pauls&oq=harry+arrives+at+st+pauls&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDgzMDZqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:750d4c61,
Royalists and Republicans. Labour and Conservative, always
threads agreeing and disagreeing
I won't post any more. Or read....
Glorianny
The news footage of Harry arriving shows, and the commentator talks of, the cheers he receives. www.google.com/search?q=harry+arrives+at+st+pauls&oq=harry+arrives+at+st+pauls&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDgzMDZqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:750d4c61,
Well, I did hear cheering and thought "someone loves him".
nadateturbe - wise move. I don’t understand the anger those ‘sone posters ‘ have towards this man and his wife. Humanity?
Thanks for those who let me know I'm not alone.
Smileless2012
The parable of the prodigal isn't about the priority of family, it's about God's love for us, His children.
And forgiveness.
The son said sorry, then the dad forgave him.
As God forgives us, [no matter what we have done], if we tell Him we are truly sorry.
Iam anger for lies and cruel words and actions
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
Anniebach
Iam anger for lies and cruel words and actions
But how do those actions affect you personally? I don't get it at all.
Iam64
nadateturbe - wise move. I don’t understand the anger those ‘sone posters ‘ have towards this man and his wife. Humanity?
Have you never read any of the angry threads about Charles, Camilla, or any other members of the RF.
The main difference seems to be the concern that Harry would be collecting information for a future episode of his memoirs.
Are all estranged families supposed to forgive and forget and allow further opportunities?
Humanity?
Anniebach
Royalists and Republicans. Labour and Conservative, always
threads agreeing and disagreeing
My late ex was a Labour supporter - but also a staunch Royalist. Of course, there are some who would say one can't be both. My best friend - who is very much of the 'set' one would expect to be a Royalist - isn't.
I think the lines are blurred a bit.
Quote MissInterpreted Thu 09-May-24 20:40:53
Anniebach
Iam anger for lies and cruel words and actions
But how do those actions affect you personally? I don't get it at all.
Cruelty affects me,
Dickens I too am a Labour supporter and a royalist
Uncle Charles hardly looks dapper either.
Starting to resemble his dad.
None of them in the first flush of youth, of course.
Calendargirl
Uncle Charles hardly looks dapper either.
Starting to resemble his dad.
None of them in the first flush of youth, of course.
Royalty and the Aristocracy don't by default have impeccable taste - nor necessarily the figure for it.
I find it comforting in a way that they can, like the rest of us, look quite unexciting in their dress.
don’t understand the anger those ‘sone posters ‘ have towards this man and his wife. Humanity?
Humanity? That's a laugh. He had precious little humanity for his old school house mistress that he cruelly and publicly mocked for the way she walked. He had even less humanity for his first lover when he described their sexual encounter is such detail that she was easily identified within hours of his book's publication. He showed zero humanity towards his fellow serving soldiers, when he bragged about keeping score of how many he'd killed on active duty, despite knowing he'd put a target on their backs. He's a walking disaster.
Anniebach
Dickens I too am a Labour supporter and a royalist
OK!
Some appear to think that 'Lefties' are by default anti-Monarchy - or, indeed, that there's a definite dividing line between Royalists and Republicans.
I'm torn between the two. The late Queen having been a 'backdrop' to most of my life, has been a bit like watching a tree in your garden grow from a sapling to a sturdy oak - whatever the weather, it's always there which is 'comforting' though of course it makes no logical sense.
Funny how those who support Harry become targets as well. The Spencers simply turned up for a service that really should have been recognised by our RF but wasn't because of a family spat. That's petty.
Considering the world wide recognition of the good the Invictus Games have done one of them should have had the grace to attend.
Dickens I can understand re the late Queen, i would find being a royalist impossible if Andrew and Sarah were in line, so not a devoted royalist . When there is mention here of a president I tend to think ‘not another election’ plus our choices
of PM’s,
How does the parable fit in this instance? In the parable, Jesus speaks of God The Father. Jesus wishes for the sinners to be forgiven by The Father.
Pope Francis: " The figure of the Father in the parable reveals the heart of God. He is the Merciful Father who, in Jesus, loves us beyond measure, always awaits our conversion every time we make mistakes; he awaits our return when we turn away from him thinking, we can do without him; he is always ready to open his arms no matter what happened. As the father of the Gospel, God also continues to consider us his children, even when we get lost, and comes to us with tenderness when we return to him. He addresses us so kindly when we believe we are right. The errors we commit, even if bad, do not wear out the fidelity of his love. In the Sacrament of Reconciliation, we can always start out anew: He welcomes us, gives us the dignity of being his children and tells us: “Go ahead! Be at peace! Rise, go ahead! ”
How could the King and Harry be depicted in the parable?
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.