I was wondering (again) if politicians in these modern times need a certain sex appeal in order to be noticeable or taken to be trustworthy.
I know past male prime ministers have not always been an oil painting eg Harold Wilson or Winston Churchill but then they were not photographed as much with the limitations of paper newspapers etc.
Were David Cameron or Tony Blair successful because they were youngish and handsome. They had that little twinkle in the eyes that people might have found appealing. Compare to Michael Foot and his shambling appearance and his lack of success.
Keir Starmer, to my mind, looks boring and stolid and not the dynamic leader we need to get us out of this rut we are in.
Do you think a physical image is more important than policies these days? Love to hear your thoughts.
There was the bloke whose girlfriend wore his football shirt, and was in the papers wearing it, as if it was uproriously naughty.
You're not thinking of David Mellor MP are you? It was reported he wore a Chelsea shirt when having sex with his mistress Antonia de Sancha. Later it was said to be made up but the scandal caused him to resign.
Margaret Thatcher was one of the most manufactured politicians ever. Her hair was lightened
Good grief! I'm speechless. Can't a woman have her hair coloured/lightened? That would rule out nearly every woman in politics.
🤣🤣🤣
A warning to any woman - "Do not dye your hair, ask for style advice or try to speak proper!"
Sorry Callistemon21 I don't object to any woman changing herself. But the changes in MT were not of her choosing. She was very much manipulated by men. The "speaking proper" which was actually deliberate lowering of her voice after opinion polls was something that she denied. But there is evidence. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p079k6gg
That was a good idea.
I often hear women reporters on TV and have to mute the TV because the pitch, not the volume, of their voices actually hurts my ears.
A lower, more modulated voice is more pleasant to listen to. A high-pitched sound is off-putting.
Oh it was a good idea. But it wasn't hers. There is some research showing that in meetings male voices being lower get listened to more than the higher pitched women's. But what is interesting as well is that women's voices have become much lower in the last 50 years. In fact the March of the Women written by Ethel Smythe for the suffragettes is too high for most women now.
The late Queen had a very high voice- remember her speech on her 21st birthday? It became lower and less 'terribly posh' over the years.