comrade
In my opinion first and foremost the money should go to the man whose Rolex was stolen. As £59000 might not be enough for a replacement, the family is asking for more donations?
But surely, there needs to be solid evidence that it was Jay who stole it? As opposed to supposition and rumour?
What about the volunteers who risked life and limb to look for him? I'd say they were more deserving than the Rolex watch-owner who - I'd imagine - has insured his watch anyway.




