Gransnet forums

Chat

Just to say

(166 Posts)
Ladyleftfieldlover Sun 14-Jul-24 18:49:57

On page 49 of today’s Observer - the main section - Catherine Bennett mentions the Gransnet ‘Angela Rayner ghastly trouser suit’ discussion.

C Bennett wasn’t amused.

Germanshepherdsmum Mon 15-Jul-24 09:13:07

Anyone can read what is posted on Gransnet BigMamma. It’s not a private forum.

Callistemon213 Mon 15-Jul-24 09:12:18

Oh dear, BigMamma, yes, perhaps more awareness should be made of this.

You could always ask for anything too personal to be deleted by reporting your own posts.
Then perhaps come back with a different name.

I was startled to find that Gransnetters are often quoted in a publication Down Under!

eazybee Mon 15-Jul-24 09:11:51

Absolutely right, Callistemon; Boris Johnson wore appropriate clothes, suit shirt, tie, for work,but always looked a mess, whether deliberately or naturally I couldn't say, and was much criticised from all quarters for his appearance.
Professionals need to dress smartly to instil confidence, for example nurses, air hostesses, lawyers are usually immaculate, whereas doctors, teachers and pharmacists increasingly affect the disordered look.

pascal30 Mon 15-Jul-24 09:10:24

Grantanow

I thought the Gransnet comments on AR's trouser suit were catty. I don't care what she wears. As Chou Enli said,'I don't care whether the cat is black or white so long as it catches mice.'

Absolutely..

M0nica Mon 15-Jul-24 09:09:26

I do not think anyone is denying that the thread on AR's trouser ssuit was unpleasant, but was it anymore unpleasant than CB's article which was partial in both its report on what was said on the thread and did a disservice to the run of threads on GN.

But is it any worse than the way such journalism works, one hasty word or comment by someone, even uttered 10 or more years ago, and it is resurrected and waved around and brandished to prove that that person is inherently racist, transphobic, a male supremecist or whatever the latest fashionable hate crime is, despite everything that person may have done, causes they may have supported that clearly showed that the remark was unrepresentative, quoted out of context or just inacurate.

We are now being nailed to the cross and this rather nasty article will be quoted as being representative of what GN is like for the next 50 years.

BigMamma Mon 15-Jul-24 09:08:25

kittylester

Are we supposed to be worried about Catherine Bennet's opinion?

I think people should be worried that when they post comments about their family and friends are being shown on the general internet. I for one, should have read the rules as I did not know that any comments we made will be put out there for the entire country to read.

This now makes any asking for help from the forums regarding family and money troubles are out of the question, especially for me.

I am now leaving the forums for good as I truly expected any comments I made to be kept within the Gransnet forums and not be posted on the World wide web.

kittylester Mon 15-Jul-24 09:07:07

Personally, it's suggest a woolie as well, Bluebelle

I love the outfit but would need to see it on really!! grin

Joseann Mon 15-Jul-24 09:05:22

Interesting comment there nanna8. However, if you look at say Arts and Culture, (which I love discussing), on GN it has five times fewer threads than Style and Beauty. So many older women obviously don't find fashion boring.

nanna8 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:57:53

I didn’t read the thread because I thought the topic was boring and I have no idea who the woman is anyway. I would have thought at our age discussing people’s clothes was kind of passé. More a teenage sort of thing.

Callistemon213 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:57:24

BlueBelle

Forgot the pic
So if you see me out give me a wave

Very nice.
We'll look out for you striding into No.10

Don't forget your waterproof.

BlueBelle Mon 15-Jul-24 08:46:48

Forgot the pic
So if you see me out give me a wave

olddog Mon 15-Jul-24 08:43:52

Marydoll

Recently I attended a Glasgow meet up. I thought I looked OK, until I saw a photo of myself. Oh dear! I think I may need new underwear!! 😱

On the other hand, I have been dissastisfied on many occasions with my appearance, yet someoneone has complemented me.

I never get it right.

If you got dressed and turned up , that's a win!

I'm sure I look a sorry sight, which is one of the reasons I clocked the aforementioned trouser suit as a rather odd choice but said nothing.

BlueBelle Mon 15-Jul-24 08:42:27

Perhaps it’s a wake up call to new posters that they can appear in newspapers etc so details of families or other identifying sentences really are a no no
We do try warning new posters but they often take no notice

The suns out today so I m now going to put my widelegged multi coloured boho thin trousers on with a white sleeveless top anyone want a go at me ? 🤣🤣🤣

Germanshepherdsmum Mon 15-Jul-24 08:39:13

kittylester

Are we supposed to be worried about Catherine Bennet's opinion?

Apparently so. I couldn’t care less what she thinks of GN. I noticed that her article bore the most flattering photo I’ve yet seen of AR in the trouser suit.

As someone said above, it reminds me why I don’t read the Guardian.

Marydoll Mon 15-Jul-24 08:38:29

Recently I attended a Glasgow meet up. I thought I looked OK, until I saw a photo of myself. Oh dear! I think I may need new underwear!! 😱

On the other hand, I have been dissastisfied on many occasions with my appearance, yet someoneone has complemented me.

I never get it right.

Grantanow Mon 15-Jul-24 08:38:17

I thought the Gransnet comments on AR's trouser suit were catty. I don't care what she wears. As Chou Enli said,'I don't care whether the cat is black or white so long as it catches mice.'

Joseann Mon 15-Jul-24 08:36:45

I think CB is on commission from ME&EM, or at least expecting a freebie. She mentions the label 3 or maybe 4 times in one article!!

Callistemon213 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:29:06

NanaTuesday

Vito

Totally agree with her. That discussion was an absolute disgrace. I could believe the amount of people who jumped on board. No I didn't read it all, the first few squalid posts were enough for me.

Totally agreed both then & now 😢

If you didn't read it all then you cannot judge.

Have you read Bennett's article?
It's as bad as some of the thread.

Callistemon213 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:27:18

Oh, it's not just us being condemned then.

Bennett is attacking anyone and everyone who had the temerity to comment on Ms Rayner's choice of trousers but goes on to criticise the attire of Tory politicians and SPADS (as has Gransnet), including a bit of fat-shaming too which is frowned upon on here.
Definitely not an unbiased piece of journalism.
😂

NanaTuesday Mon 15-Jul-24 08:25:33

Vito

Totally agree with her. That discussion was an absolute disgrace. I could believe the amount of people who jumped on board. No I didn't read it all, the first few squalid posts were enough for me.

Totally agreed both then & now 😢

dragonfly46 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:21:15

No doubt Catherine Bennett will be pleased she stirred up such a reaction!

Callistemon213 Mon 15-Jul-24 08:15:59

Marydoll

^For the ones that make fun of other peoples dress, I wish they would post a photo of themselves so we can see how they dress.^

This!

Certainly not!
I did say on that thread how embarrassed I felt when I saw myself in photos at DD's graduation, wearing a new trouser suit which I thought was great at the time but was not a good choice!!
And that we all make fashion faux pas (but not quite so publicly).

Did said journalist criticise Gransnetters who criticised Boris Johnson's sartorial choices or hair?
Of course not!

kittylester Mon 15-Jul-24 08:13:45

Are we supposed to be worried about Catherine Bennet's opinion?

Joseann Mon 15-Jul-24 08:01:28

The other faux pas with clothes, is asking someone where they bought an item, then buying it for yourself, and finding it looks completely wrong!

harrigran Mon 15-Jul-24 07:58:35

That newspaper article was long winded and boring, she could have made her point in a couple of sentences.