Ziplok
Obviously, it depends upon what the plastic surgery is for. If it’s just to “make you look younger” or enhance your figure or other purely cosmetic procedures, then having it could be questionable (but again, this might be more to do with the persons emotional perception of themself, but a good surgeon should help them to reach the best decision).
However, if the plastic surgery is to help someone who has a disfigurement of some kind that they have been born with or developed or acquired through accident/injury/illness, then this should be acknowledged by us and not dismissed as vanity.
I think it has always been clear on this thread from the very start, that we are talking about vanity plastic surgery. Surgery done for aesthetic reasons, not surgery done for therapeutic reasons.
Twelve years ago, following a car accident , DD left most of the skin on her right forearm on the A1(M), somewhere between the M25 junction and Hatfield. From A&E, she went straight to the plastic surgery department. She had 3 operations in the 10 days before she was discharged and over the next 5 years before final discharge had innumerable more operations and treatments to make the very large scar as aesthetically satisfactory as they could.
It was the NHS at its very best. Her injury was relatively unusual, but she shared her ward with the many people left scarred by burns and scalds.
Obviously, no one is talking about that kind of surgery, in this thread.
DD has never been remotely embarrassed by her scar, which is only too visible. She is a swimmer, going swimming several times a week, she wears short sleeves in summer and if anyone enquires, she will tell them how she ot the scar. In fact, the reaction of most people reflects her own, they either fail to see it, mentally or actually, and do sometimes ask her how she acquired it, and she tells them.