Gransnet forums

Chat

Dennis the Menace and Beryl the Peril next door.

(170 Posts)
FriedGreenTomatoes2 Mon 13-Jan-25 22:07:38

What do you think of Labour so far?
Yes 14 years of ‘chaos and division’ with the Tories and so 6 months isn’t long by comparison.

But how do you feel they’re doing?
Anyone with voter’s remorse or is it still too early to tell?
Are you optimistic about 4 more years with them or are you disappointed?

Luckygirl3 Tue 14-Jan-25 12:04:36

What I want of Labour is for them to be radical - to take some steps to get us out of this elitist rut and truly take some fundamental steps towards social equality.

This involves risks - and I think they have taken their political risks in the wrong ways in these first few months. I am not afraid of spending (national budgets are not like domestic budgets) and think they need the courage to say that we cannot have an equitable society without spending money - that this spending will reap rewards in the long term. We always hear that austerity will reap rewards but those rewards go to a small group of people and leave others in poverty, which inclines towards breakdown in law and order, health costs etc.

I wish they would grab some of this by the balls and stride out with conviction. I am feeling disappointed in this tinkering. But I still think they are streets ahead of their predecessors.

Soniah Tue 14-Jan-25 12:07:40

If they/we're not careful it will be Reform at the next election

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Tue 14-Jan-25 12:11:15

Again, I agree mostly with what you’re saying Luckygirl. Labour have a huge majority so they can be bold. But I too think they’re running in the wrong direction.

And re Reeves?
When a prime minister is forced to defend his chancellor in the manner in which Starmer was, his claim she has his full confidence means she is for the chop. Place your bets. She’s out within a fortnight.

To be replaced by McFadden. Reeves is looking increasingly stressed.

Allira Tue 14-Jan-25 12:15:11

When a prime minister is forced to defend his chancellor in the manner in which Starmer was, his claim she has his full confidence means she is for the chop. Place your bets. She’s out within a fortnight.

When a Minister starts to become a liability, not an asset, then I agree.
Starmer is more ruthless than he looks and I don't think Reeves will last the course.

sazz1 Tue 14-Jan-25 12:21:31

Didn't vote for Starmer and I'm disgusted that he's gone back on everything he stood for when in opposition. Caring about elderly keeping warm, reducing or making uni fees free, to name just two. Also there's his time in the CPS where serious cases were not prosecuted. The UK is stagnating due to businesses leaving or folding under the NI employers rise. Soon I predict a recession. Also farmers family members face inheritance tax if they sell their farms, robbing the dead. Building on green land policies coming I'm sure. And he's done nothing at all to stop the boats, so the cost to UK rises. And more people will die. Including pensioners who are just under the PC limit with no savings.
His latest trick is to spend billions on AI. Unbelievable.

JdotJ Tue 14-Jan-25 12:31:35

Kate1949

I was hoping this would be a nostalgic thread about comics. How disappointing,

So did I

Beeches Tue 14-Jan-25 12:35:31

What we haven’t ever experienced in the UK is the horror show that a far right populist party would be like in power. The US are about to find out with Trump who even before moving back in on the 20th is breaking all his promises to his voter base. No one in their right mind would think Reform is trustworthy or would have normal peoples interests at heart because by their very nature it is not what they want power for. Despite their current up tick in popularity they are in a mess. Farage has fallen out of favour with his fan base and backers, they are a not centrist enough for this country to stomach. Some of that is due to a pretty good level of education attainment in the UK that ensures voters are capable of spotting nonsense and false prophets. Meanwhile we have an imperfect but adult party in power during the worst global economic era that can only get worse with climate change so buckle up, it’s a rough time to be alive

knspol Tue 14-Jan-25 12:47:04

I agree the Tories were doing a dreadful job but it did appear that the economy at least was going in the right direction. I didn't vote for labour even though I was disillusioned with the conservatives and I'm glad that I didn't. They spent a long time in opposition and said they were ready to go in govt but obviously found it more difficult than they expected and are doing a very poor job so far.
When I saw the headlines that KS was supporting RR my first thought was to wonder if it was similar to football managers when no sooner had similar words been uttered than the manager would be sacked.

Luckygirl3 Tue 14-Jan-25 13:10:01

I agree the Tories were doing a dreadful job but it did appear that the economy at least was going in the right direction. - I cannot agree with that. It was going in the direction of dividing the nation and that is a dangerous route to follow. And please do not forget Truss - her economic actions could hardly be described as the "right direction."

It has become a cliche to regard the Tories as the only party that can govern in a financially responsible way regardless of the facts.

Cambia Tue 14-Jan-25 13:10:49

I really wanted Labour to succeed and I am usually a Conservative voter but they could not carry on behaving as they were. The budget has however been horrific for us being in a small business. We won’t be taking on new staff and we will be spending our money rather than reinvesting it hoping to avoid a large inheritance tax when we die. It seems wrong that we are being encouraged to behave like this after years of saving and investing and providing local work. I am not sure how Labour think the country can grow when business is so discouraged. I also think when we are in such a precarious financial state they should have started in their own back yard and cut jobs in a bloated public sector. I might have more faith if they didn’t seem to be just the same old labour of tax the rich until they sell up and leave the country. Sadly they are opening the door up to Reform.

Galton Tue 14-Jan-25 13:59:00

I am old enough to remember Shirley Williams and her 15p loaf of bread. 15p - what is it now nearly £2.

Barleyfields Tue 14-Jan-25 14:54:30

Reeves has said today that she plans to ‘go further and faster’ in balancing tax receipts with spending (sounds like she’s dealing with her housekeeping money) and she has refused to rule out a further budget in the spring despite having committed to one budget a year and a spring statement. It doesn’t sound good.

GardenofEngland Tue 14-Jan-25 15:03:21

At least we knew what to expect from the Tories but this 'labour' the party for the working class is certainly making an almighty mess of everything. I don't trust any of them Starmer is far worse than Boris or Rishi. And the 3 witches Reeves, Rayner and Philipson are way out of their skill levels. I just hope we have a better choice at the next election.

heavenlyheath Tue 14-Jan-25 15:05:19

They are picking on the pensioners we have the same high costs of living but no thought for us. I for one single occupant (69) with all that entails and is still paying tax.😤

theworriedwell Tue 14-Jan-25 15:19:25

How childish. Don't you know their actual names or are you really that silly?

theworriedwell Tue 14-Jan-25 15:21:22

Heavenlyheath if your income is high enough why wouldn't you pay tax like some one younger with the same income.

Doodledog Tue 14-Jan-25 15:26:50

GardenofEngland

At least we knew what to expect from the Tories but this 'labour' the party for the working class is certainly making an almighty mess of everything. I don't trust any of them Starmer is far worse than Boris or Rishi. And the 3 witches Reeves, Rayner and Philipson are way out of their skill levels. I just hope we have a better choice at the next election.

Why do you think that the Labour party is 'for the working class'? How are you defining 'working class' there?

If you mean people 'who go to work' then they have seen the minimum wage rise, workers' rights increased, commutes to and from work eased and the NHS moving towards being more quickly accessible. More people who are not working are now being expected to do so, which is not a bad thing, IMO - particularly at a time when so many people seem to want to stop immigration.

If you don't mean 'people who go to work' when you say that Labour is 'for the working class', who do you mean?

missdeke Tue 14-Jan-25 15:50:48

M0nica

The problem is we had no choice at the last election. The Conservatives had become so incapable of governing that they really were the very worse option, but like it or leave it, Labour was the only other party in contention.

I have never voted for either of the big parties. What keeps me going is the knowledge is that no matter how incompetent this shower are, and my oodness they are! The Conswrvatives would have been even worse.

The last election was won on a 'we must do what we can to get the Tories out' and most people felt that Labour really was the only option, we definitely need to try and get rid of all extremist politicians and give the lesser parties a chance.

Barleyfields Tue 14-Jan-25 16:31:09

Doodledog

GardenofEngland

At least we knew what to expect from the Tories but this 'labour' the party for the working class is certainly making an almighty mess of everything. I don't trust any of them Starmer is far worse than Boris or Rishi. And the 3 witches Reeves, Rayner and Philipson are way out of their skill levels. I just hope we have a better choice at the next election.

Why do you think that the Labour party is 'for the working class'? How are you defining 'working class' there?

If you mean people 'who go to work' then they have seen the minimum wage rise, workers' rights increased, commutes to and from work eased and the NHS moving towards being more quickly accessible. More people who are not working are now being expected to do so, which is not a bad thing, IMO - particularly at a time when so many people seem to want to stop immigration.

If you don't mean 'people who go to work' when you say that Labour is 'for the working class', who do you mean?

AFAIK Starmer and Reeves could not agree on a definition of the ‘working people’ for whom they professed to stand. We knew that could never mean pensioners, and so it has proved. They don’t give a damn about pensioners.

Obviously farmers are not working people. Those who run other businesses, small or large, are not working people. They can only mean wage slaves, but some of those earn huge salaries. I remain mystified.

Doodledog Tue 14-Jan-25 16:58:16

Clearly. The LP 'professes to stand' for everyone. The days when 'labour' meant manual work and the LP was the party of manual workers are long gone. My understanding is that the LP has more university-educated members than the Tories. The difference may be that the Tories are clearly not in support of workers (ie those who work for others) as is clear from their reluctance to increase the minimum wage, and to tax wealth and inheritance rather than earned income.

It's interesting that those who criticise them for not supporting 'the working class' are never willing to say who it is to whom they refer.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Tue 14-Jan-25 17:05:47

theworriedwell

How childish. Don't you know their actual names or are you really that silly?

I’m really that silly. 😁

Allira Tue 14-Jan-25 17:14:44

😂

theworriedwell Tue 14-Jan-25 17:18:22

FGT it's nothing to be proud of so your response tells us all we need to know.

Casdon Tue 14-Jan-25 17:20:43

Not everybody knows their comics, for sure. Dennis and Beryl always get away with it and triumph in the end, which rather blows the point of the original post. They aren’t in the same comic either.

Ladyleftfieldlover Tue 14-Jan-25 17:22:36

No one has mentioned the absolute dog’s dinner which is Brexit.