I have no interest in Megan, she is shallow, a camera and microphone is her world
Silly First World Problem ( bothering me)
Ethical question - how do you feel about second chance??
Unite the Kingdom and Pro Palestine marches Cup 16th May 2026
From The Tines this morning
Imagine if I told you I was giving you something “in keepsake packaging that you can repurpose to tuck away love notes or special treasures, and to remember this pivotal moment with me”. You would look at me strangely and ask if I should perhaps seek specialist medical help, and you would be right. And if I then told you that this keepsake packaging could be used as a “small bud vase for flowers on your nightstand or to hold pens on your desk”, could you guess what it was ?
A vintage piece of pretty china, say? Big reveal: it's a jam jar^
Whouda thunk?
Using an old jam jar for pencils? (Who uses pencils?)
Personally I put mine through the dishwasher and re use them for the next batch of raspberry jam -sorry, spread
I have no interest in Megan, she is shallow, a camera and microphone is her world
I spotted fish paste in glass jars in M&S today! I dithered over whether to buy one to store my thermometer in, but to be honest, I don’t think fish paste jars are made with digital thermometers in mind. 🤔 😂
Anniebach
How does she manage to cause such distress to many
It's not Megan or Harry!
It's because people are like lemmings & they believe all the stuff written in the tabloids, they hate the Sussex's because they went their own way.
Don't forget to question the articles that are printed in the the news and don't forget how they made Diana's life absolutely awful towards the end. 🤔
I listen to their interviews, never watched the crown.
Anniebach
I listen to their interviews, never watched the crown.
Why? If you have no interest in Megan(sic) ??
They gave many interviews from their engagement on
I haven't watched The Crown either.
Is it relevant? - I may have missed it.
Many believe it true
Allira
There are lots of people who seem to know what Diana would have thought, Ilovedogs.
They must all be spirit mediums!
Of course it's hypothetical. I think it would be safe to assume Diana, like most mothers, would not have been pleased for a partner to get in between her two sons and cause an enormous amount of friction between two brothers, so much so, they no longer speak.
What we do know is that H&M left the late Queen feeling pretty troubled in those final years.
Anniebach
I don’t read Daily Mail,
You get your opinions somewhere and those publications make huge money off articles that are critical of Meghan . You are always the first to take time to say how much you don’t like her .
They both give and have given many tv interviews
I don’t usually bother to read celebrity scandals in the press or magazines. Usually I don’t even know who they are anyway though of course I know Harry and Meghan.
But I have to ask, does it not bother people who support them when they themselves have contradictory versions of things that have happened, like the I was a latchkey kid who only ate ready meals, when previously there’s a recording of Meghan saying This is what we ate - good home cooking with basic ingredients.
Or a load of other stuff.
Does it not bug you that the story changes depending on who they’re talking to? Or do you just think Well everybody makes things up.
I know I’m a stickler for truth and the white lies/ tell a story doesn’t bother others as much. Personally I could never trust anything someone said once I knew they’d deliberately misled me.
Last year hugging mothers whose children had taken their lives
because of social media, standing before cameras gripping a microphone speaking of the evils of social media
Syracute
Anniebach
I don’t read Daily Mail,
You get your opinions somewhere and those publications make huge money off articles that are critical of Meghan . You are always the first to take time to say how much you don’t like her .
They have made their own publicity, Syracute.
Oprah, books etc.
Anniebach is entitled to her opinion without being accused of forming her opinions from biased newspapers.
I'm feeling rather sorry for Harry at the moment with the accusations flying around from the Chairperson of Sentabale. Harry, I am sure, would never be misogynistic as she claims. The whole committee and both founders have resigned at her actions.
Thank you Allira, I have said their interviews and their speeches
I do feel very sorry for Prince Harry over what has happened at Sentabale - and indeed for his Lesotho co-founder.
It is clear that both sank their hearts in this project. That the whole board of trustees resigned at once, does suggest that something has gone badly wrong, which suggests something more than just a clash of personalities.
Hopefully, the Charity Commission enquiry will get to the heart of the matter and require changes that sort the problem out.
I have always thought it a shame that Prince Harry ever left the army. He was well liked and respected, which suggests he was doing a good job, which is, for example, more than be said of Prince Andrew, who was cordially disliked by almost everyone who served with him.
Andrew has never given interviews criticising his family, never written a book attacking his family.
I. Am sure it will all end in success for Harry,
He did, however, give a spectacular car-crash of an interview which must have been hugely embarrassing for his family, I would have thought.
Harry would have struggled with furthering his career in the army once his active service was over as he has a poor academic record.
MOnica one of the trustees has been a friend of Harry since
Eaton
merlotgran
Harry would have struggled with furthering his career in the army once his active service was over as he has a poor academic record.
There is more to enjoying a career than making great progress. Prince Harry certainly did not have a Field Marshall baton in his back pack, but that is no reason to have stopped him having an enjoyable career in the army. I mean that does not stop most people enjoying their work.
Would he had been happy just being ‘one of the troupes ’
I think it was unwise to make Meghan a central figure in both his charities. After all she has no official standing as a trustee or any other position within Sentebale or Invictus, and her prominent presence at events does seems to have caused some problems at both of them.
After all no other patrons or trustees have involved their wives or husbands in presentations of cups or giving speeches so I think a Chair would be justified in asking why a non member was given such prominence.
I also think it was noise to have a Board of Trustees made up of personal friends of the patrons and again can see how it could have been difficult to get the Board to discuss the impact that leaving Britain and subsequent publicity might have had on funding sources.
The whole Board has resigned which sounds alarm bells, but after they had collectively been reported to the Charity Commission by the Chair.
I await the report with interest.
I have read very little about Meghan. I don’t read newspapers any more. I’ve seen her on tv and online, though, and I instinctively dislike her. She seems to me to have an incredible lack of self-awareness. The whole ‘cookery’ thing and her promotion of her very ordinary condiments is just absurd. And the name -As Ever - what is that supposed to mean? It doesn’t make sense.
Good point Lathyrus3
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.