Claremont
fancythat
GrannyGravy13
Claremont you have said that you and your husband came to the UK through legal routes and worked.
We are not discussing regular migration/immigration which occurs worldwide, we are discussing irregular migration.
Irregular migration, mostly young men, with absolutely no documentation, which makes it difficult for the HO to find out who exactly they are and where they are from.
Two totally different things, not to be confused or conflated.Hear hear.
Appears it still needs to be said.
What a shame.my point is, that the legal routes we used, my OH in 1948, me in 1970 - are no longer possible or legal. They were then.
my point is, that the legal routes we used, my OH in 1948, me in 1970 - are no longer possible or legal. They were then.
I think you said your DH was 2 when he came over, correct me if I'm wrong, so it would have been his parents who came legally.
You said you yourself would not have been able to stay but that you married your DH who by then presumably was a British citizen. Thst route was discontinued because it was found to be being abused by sham marriages, hence the problems of a couple of people we know who still live with uncertainty that the wife could be deported back to her war-torn country, even though she married a British citizen and they have a child.
Perhaps that seven year route to leave to remain/citizenship needs to be re-addressed by politicians as there may be many genuine cases which are falling foul of the rules, as the anxiety and uncertainty causes misery.

