Gransnet forums

Chat

Andy Warhol, just me?

(32 Posts)
hollysteers Sun 28-Jun-26 16:08:09

I draw and paint and like modern art as well as traditional, but for the life of me do not understand why his coloured prints of celebrities are so popular.

That’s what they are, just coloured prints and one of my artist friends finds making them of various well known people sell well.
I find them boring and lacking any insight or skill.
Anyone else?

Ilovedogs22 Tue 30-Jun-26 11:17:37

DollyRocker

Art is subjective. Personally I like his art & would have loved to have met him.

Oh yes, me too DollyRocker.
Although, he would have probably have hated me! I'm a very stubborn opinionated, catty woman & we would have most likely have clashed horribly. 😶

butterandjam Tue 30-Jun-26 11:25:32

OldFrill

I'm holding tight whilst the bus is steadying "ding ding"

May I see your ticket, madam?

polly123 Tue 30-Jun-26 13:29:30

As with all well known artists (or masters as they are sometimes called), Warhol broke down a barrier and introduced a new and exciting (at the time) way of seeing. As has already been said, celebrities were seen as products just as were the soup cans. Now they can look dated and simplistic. They do have a significant place in the history of painting.

hollysteers Tue 30-Jun-26 13:49:02

I remember them at the time they appeared and never found them exciting.
Whereas I love the lobster telephone!

graciemabel Tue 30-Jun-26 23:09:44

Overrated garbage! I saw Van Goughs sunflowers in Amsterdam, I think I could have done that!

MayBee70 Thu 02-Jul-26 19:45:34

The thing about Van Gogh though is that if you see one of his lesser known works ( and some of them are beautiful, especially his use of colour) you know straight away that it’s his work.