Callistemon21
^The context^
Do you think a child should be told they can't have the one present they'd like because someone else might not be able to afford the same?
I don't think it works like that. Rather like my Mum telling me to eat all my dinner because children in India were starving all those years ago. It made no difference to them if I ate it or not. What made a difference (I hope) was the 2s 6d she gave me to take into school for the appeal.
I think she struggled to spare that money.
If Gin can't afford it and will go without heat or food then her DGS should be told, kindly. He's old enough to understand.
Looking at Louise in that link (she was on local TV too) makes me realise just how generous people are.
🙂
No it is not at all the same about eating your dinner and children in India. What a terrible think to say, really.
The children who do receive presents which have been 'pushed onto them but outrageous advertising' - will share the same classroom, playground and social life as those who didn't- let alone those expensive i-phones, top label clothes, etc.
The pressure on parents this year more than most, is that many children will get very little, or parents will be pressured to get into debt that will cripple them, so their children are not left behind, and possible mocked and worse, at school.
So for me, it is not about what the GP or P can afford, but also about thinking about context, and the effect on others, and perhaps show a bit of restraint.
The BIG question for me, is HOW! How did a child that age get the idea that a 30-50 quid of perfume would be a 'must' for Christmas, and that it is 'appropriate'. HOW? Do you know that the UK is one of the few countries were it is allowed to bombard kids with Xmas advertising on TV, for instance, and this from early in autumn.
They are pressured to want, want, want - and become part of this vicious circle of constant 'wants'. We should do everything to help them not become hooked.