The whole point is that if people, "break the rules" as so many sheeple insist he did, in the same way D.C. did, i.e. making sure that they don't come into contact with with others, keeping strict social distances at all times, etc., then it will have no effect whatsoever on the spread of this dreadful disease.
If, on the other hand, people take the attitude that, "if he can do what he wants, so can I" , and start crowding in places with never a thought of who they may be next to or how far away they are from them, like the reporters on D. C. 's doorstep then yes, look out for the second spike in a week because, never mind the rights and wrongs of anyone's behaviour, that is the sort of behaviour that causes this infernal disease to spread.
Anyone with half a brain could see that there were areas of the "rules" that were open to sensible and mindful interpretation according to circumstances. D. C. 's biggest mistake was in presuming everyone possesses the level intelligence to realise that.
It was made evident that this isn't the case when the first set of measures for easing the lockdown were announced, resulting in the flood of posts on all kinds of social media saying, "it's not clear!" meaning, "we don't understand!" Funny, I wonder how many of the same people are the ones now saying, "he broke the rules; the rules say this, that the other; the exceptions were only for anyone suffering abuse, etc. etc." Make up your minds, either he wrote the rules and therefore knows that he didn't break them, or he doesn't understand them and therefore can't have written them in which case he's no more culpable than the next Stephen Kinnock!
The bottom line is, whatever he's done or hasn't done, nobody was put in any more danger than they would have been had they stayed in London. Fewer people were exposed to COVID-19 than if he'd got someone to come into his London home to be on standby, whether hired (which most definitely was "against the rules" at the time) or family. Let's not forget Harry Day's now famous observation:
"Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men."
Yes, he was cavalier of the feelings of others and should apologise and pay a fine like everyone else.
Yes, I'm annoyed at him for not being man enough to say his jaunt to Barnard Castle had no real justifucation and I'm sorry I went. But I'm more annoyed at the manipulation of the British public by the media and at the British public for allowing themselves to be led by the nose. It's plainly obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that this is being orchestrated by Remainers (as most of the media are) and, whether you are pro or anti EU, the fact remains that many traditional Labour voters lent their votes to Boris Johnson on the promise that he would "get Brexit done", and, in doing so, handed the government a clear and resounding mandate to do just that on their behalf.
If Brexit fails as a result of the baying mob, and it's far more likely to happen if D.C. is ousted from his post, then the left will have delivered the biggest betrayal of the British electorate that I certainly will have ever seen and that will outweigh any supposed betrayal by D. C. over Easter.
By special request, let’s discuss our favourite Classic Music and why?
Unite the Kingdom and Pro Palestine marches Cup 16th May 2026


