Vaccine groups

I'm really really not sure yet that I would want the vaccine...and if I had to have it...my gut feeling would be for the Oxford vaccine....tin hat on now and behind the settee...

Greeneyedgirl

Surely it’s a matter of the NHS being overwhelmed and it’s on average over 60s who are taking up hospital beds, so it seems logical for vaccs to be prioritised for NHS workers and elderly.

We are not merely economic units but human beings, and I we should bear this in mind too.

I agree with your last sentence.

It would be a very sad day if people were prioritised in their order of value to the economy. There is no doubt that culling the elderly would result in other people being wealthier.

The cost to the NHS for people in the last year or so of their lives is disproportionate. We could refuse to fund expensive operations, unless people were worth it in economic terms. Most elderly people are economically inactive. They might pay tax, but they also live in housing which is excessive to their needs. If they were to die, their wealth could be redistributed.

I'm afraid that from a purely economic perspective, there are plenty of reasons not to prioritise the elderly and vulnerable. I'm glad that I live in a society which does prioritise them at times. We would be on a slippery downwards slope if we didn't. How about the seriously disabled? Should we cull them too?

I think this country has done well to get the vaccinations started. Three of my neighbours have had the first one - two are over 80 and the other is in the NHS.

I am clinically extremely vulnerable and am in group 4. I rather wish I was higher up but will carry on staying away from people as much as possible.

Surely it’s a matter of the NHS being overwhelmed and it’s on average over 60s who are taking up hospital beds, so it seems logical for vaccs to be prioritised for NHS workers and elderly.

We are not merely economic units but human beings, and I we should bear this in mind too.

Lucca

Police and teachers please.

Let the NHS get on with vaccinating those most likely to die without people squabbling about which groups are more important.

Police and teachers please.

Good reasons for the current plan are:

1 - There is (as yet) no proof that vaccination prevents transmission:

fortune.com/2020/12/22/covid-vaccine-infectious-face-masks-transmission/

2 - Think about the numbers of people involved. There are far fewer beyond retirement age:

www.statista.com/statistics/281174/uk-population-by-age/

I apologise to those who are fed up my repeating the above. It's not my opinion. It's fact. There is a very good reason the order for vaccines was decided.

Children CANNOT be vaccinated because trials have not taken place. Even if they were, it has not been established that they would not pass on infection.

I think the same as you Sarnia. All NHS staff, police, firepersons. Then children and students. Then theres reduced chance of teachers getting it and schools Unis etc can get back to normal quickly.
Why do we who don't go out much need it first, if like me we childmind even then the children will be vaccinated.

Sarnia you should not under estimate the contribution that older people make to the economy. Get rid of us and the economy would collapse.

Retitement age is 67 and more and more people work beyond retirement age, by choice and because they have skills otherwise in short supply, especially when coupled with years of experience. Many of us are paying taxes on our incomes, we are very important to specific industries like tourism, food retail, and many earning their living from the medical and care industries. Get rid of us and where do they get their livings from?

The fact of the matter is that we cannot afford to sacrifice any specific age group, we are all interwoven with each other and interdependent. The vaccine should go to those most at risk and in this pandemic it is the elderly.

Tangerine

As with so many important decisions in life, there is never an entirely right or wrong answer.

I understand the logic behind Sarnia's post to some degree but think we do need to look after the most vulnerable people in society first.

You can't just throw people on the scrapheap. I am sure that is not what Sarnia truly wants either.

Most definitely not. All of us are important and deserve care, love and dignity no matter who we are or how old we are and irrespective of our circumstances. I fear for our economy as much as the health of our nation. As you say there isn't a right or wrong answer.

As with so many important decisions in life, there is never an entirely right or wrong answer.

I understand the logic behind Sarnia's post to some degree but think we do need to look after the most vulnerable people in society first.

You can't just throw people on the scrapheap. I am sure that is not what Sarnia truly wants either.

M0nica

But they are the group that suffer least when they get it. Those most vulnerable should get it first.

I feel that these are the ones who are driving the economy and are out and about more, so merrily passing it on to others who can really be affected by it.

But they are the group that suffer least when they get it. Those most vulnerable should get it first.