growstuff
PippaZ
Why does everyone feel that 60% protection against the Indian variant is so great? That means just under half of the people who could pass it on to you could still do so.
And then there is the Yorkshire variant about which we seem to know nothing as yet.
The Indian variant is particularly prevalent in schools, which could explain why it appears more transmissible. As very few school age children have been vaccinated yet, that means the protection is currently much lower than 60%. In theory, vaccinations offer 60% protection, but in practice vaccination currently offers very little protection for the very simple reason that most of the people who are catching this variant aren't vaccinated.
In case people have missed it, it's now known that data on the Indian variant in schoolchildren has been withheld from the public.
In truth, I had heard little news yesterday as I was, what is for me, incredibly busy. I certainly hadn't heard about the data on schoolchildren being withheld and find that very concerning as, I would imagine, would anyone with children or grandchildren.
I also hadn't thought about the fact that one first vaccination only gives 30%. When everyone starts their rushing backwards and forwards to other countries because they 'cannot live without a holiday abroad, darling' I wonder how many will have only had the first?
But of course, according to some on here, if that is a problem then those who would be affected just need to shut themselves away, never going out. I see those on the right still have no sense of doing things for the "common good". Good old Tories, eh!
*Interesting to read that Tory was an insult (derived from the Middle Irish word tóraidhe, modern Irish tóraí, meaning "outlaw", "robber", from the Irish word tóir, meaning "pursuit" since outlaws were "pursued men") that entered English politics during the Exclusion Bill crisis of 1678–1681. The more things change the more things stay the same it seems.