Well quite, jings but no suggestion of terrorism here until Gove sent someone who was an expert in terrorism to do his own investigation.
ana we shall see when we have had all the reports from all the various investigators. Wouldn't it be interesting if they didn't agree. I take a sceptical view of anonymous letters myself. They lob a grenade but don't have the courage to come forward and explain themselves.
aka there have been school governors for a long time. Longer than I have been alive I think. At one time they were all local councillors or the friends of local councillors but that is long gone.
They have been given more responsibility over the years and in many schools (it depends on type of school...) they are the ultimate employer. Without governors there is no-one to oversee the performance of the head teacher, nobody to act as a court of appeal if the head acts unfairly, and no-one to actually interview and employ a new head.
The most important thing most governing bodies do is interview and select a new head. Not easy in these times when there are few applicants. A friend of mine is a governor of an outstanding primary in a pleasant area. Only 2 applicants for headship and neither of them were deemed up to scratch.
The single biggest responsibility that I had, potentially, as a chair of governors was that if someone made a serious complaint about the head, I would have to suspend him on full pay, staying within the procedures laid down in the school disciplinary procedures etc
Twice as a governor I had to sit on a panel of governors which sacked a teacher. Not nice. It's a very serious responsibility and there is no compulsory training whatsoever.