Gransnet forums

Education

For those who say that children don't learn grammar any more.....

(104 Posts)
Mamie Mon 25-Jan-16 06:41:01

Here is a short sample from the spelling and grammar test that eleven-year-olds will take this year.
www.sats2016.co.uk/think-youd-pass-your-sats-in-2016/
How did you do?

Granarchist Mon 25-Jan-16 11:51:54

80% - but where did the imperfect tense go and wth is a determiner? Try re-writing the test with the definitions we learnt and I bet most gransnetters would get 100%

Elegran Mon 25-Jan-16 11:54:34

That is a teacher who has no idea herself about grammar. She means an adverbial phrase. Half a label is worse than none! She doesn't even know that a word ending in -ial is more likely to be a "determiner" (as it seems now to be called) than a noun.

Elegran Mon 25-Jan-16 11:55:05

That was tojoannapiano

Badenkate Mon 25-Jan-16 12:00:10

An adverbial is an adverb, adverbial phrase, or an adverbial clause. It is a recognised grammatical term.

Badenkate Mon 25-Jan-16 12:02:47

Determiners are words that introduce a noun, such as many, some, the, all etc

joannapiano Mon 25-Jan-16 12:15:22

Unfortunately it wasn't recognised by me or the 9 year old, Badenkate.
I will have to get a " Modern English Grammar for Dummies" book from Amazon!

MaizieD Mon 25-Jan-16 12:28:18

Oh dear, 50% sad

But it's not because I can't write grammatically, it's because I don't know the terminology. We learned the basic parts of speech and verb tenses at primary school and did some basic parsing of sentences at grammar school. We also did a lot of precis work, which really concentrated the mind on how to convey an idea accurately and economically. We were never subjected to such technical terms.

I really don't understand the need for primary children to be taught the technicalities in such depth. Is it really going to improve their use of English? I feel that, for many children, being able to identify parts of a sentence by their function doesn't guarantee that they will use that knowledge to write better constructed prose. I think they would learn far more from extensive reading of good prose and hearing language 'correctly' spoken.

But this is counteracted by the ongoing debate about what is 'correct' English. While there is a whole school of thought which prizes the use of local dialects which don't conform to the 'rules' of English grammar, and asserts that insisting on such 'rules' is elitist, there is never going to be any consistency in the application of 'grammar'. There are still teachers who will insist that it doesn't really matter how sentences, written or spoken, are constructed as long as the person reading them is able to 'get' their meaning. (Likewise with the incorrect use of words)

Mamie Mon 25-Jan-16 12:43:56

MaizieD I completely disagree with your last paragraph. Whilst you might have found teachers with views like that in the seventies and eighties I can assure that it has not been like that since the arrival of the National Literacy Strategy in the nineties.
Apart from anything else Ofsted would certainly not consider that as acceptable teaching.
This test will be taken by all children in the last year of primary school and
everyone has to teach grammar.

ninathenana Mon 25-Jan-16 12:51:31

My brother is a free lance proof reader and reads a lot of highly technical reports.
I wonder what he would say about the new terminology.
I'm refusing to tell you my score for the quiz shock

MaizieD Mon 25-Jan-16 12:55:30

Sorry, Maimie, but I have 'debated' this point on TES with teachers in the past few years, so it's not an outdated view. I have even worked with English (subject) teachers who speak the local dialect and seem quite unaware that they are tacitly supporting the use of poor grammar (which, to be fair, they would probably correct in written work).

Mamie Mon 25-Jan-16 13:12:17

They would still be working within the requirements of the National Curricuum even if they held those views in private MaizieD. There can be difficult issues with teachers who speak non-standard English, but schools really have to tackle them if the pupils are going to meet the required standard.

gettingonabit Mon 25-Jan-16 13:17:34

That was difficult. I thought my grammar was pretty good, but....

I don't recall ever having been taught some of that!

gettingonabit Mon 25-Jan-16 13:23:23

I was confused by "adverbial" too. Adverbial what? And modal something? Didn't know what a determiner was either.

I've got a languages degreeblush.

granjura Mon 25-Jan-16 13:30:51

90% only, but then my mt is French

miep Mon 25-Jan-16 13:34:22

I spent my career as a copywriter, though would not know a modal verb if it bit me!

gettingonabit Mon 25-Jan-16 13:46:09

I'm by no means an expert on these matters, but I'd be concerned that today's teachers wouldn't have a clue about some of these things either. My score was nothing to write home about, but the average score was very poor indeed.

My impression is that, in general, teachers' grasp of spelling, in particular, is woeful.

Maybe I'm wrong?

trisher Mon 25-Jan-16 14:57:51

MaizieD some people are quite able to distinguish between dialect and colloquialisms and correct grammar. They may choose to speak or write in dialect so that they connect and form bonds with the children they are teaching. They are still able to use the language correctly when they wish. Many children are able to do this as well. Preserving spoken dialects should be as important as teaching grammar. Who wants a society where everyone speaks BBC English?

Anya Mon 25-Jan-16 15:05:09

Teachers' (sic) grasp of spellings !!!! grin

rosesarered Mon 25-Jan-16 15:10:15

You is all wrong abowt us young wons gramma innit?

rosesarered Mon 25-Jan-16 15:12:43

We noes all abowt apostriffis, banana's pear's and apple's, yeah?

Mamie Mon 25-Jan-16 15:16:06

Yes you are wrong gettingonabit.
It would be very hard to explain the improved standards achieved at Key Stage 2 if teachers did not understand what they were teaching.
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/483897/SFR47_2015_text.pdf
I imagine nobody thinks that the tests are getting easier, based on this example.

MaizieD Mon 25-Jan-16 15:27:34

I think you prove my point, trisher. People do defend the use of dialect and it conflicts with the teaching of grammar at KS2 (and KS3). I was trying not to be judgemental, just saying that it happens.

I always used grammatical English with the children I worked with and I had a different accent and didn't speak their dialect. It didn't seem to be a barrier to communication or establishing good relationships.

trisher Mon 25-Jan-16 16:00:02

So why do you think teachers who use dialect cannot teach grammar?
"While there is a whole school of thought which prizes the use of local dialects which don't conform to the 'rules' of English grammar, and asserts that insisting on such 'rules' is elitist, there is never going to be any consistency in the application of 'grammar'. "
Using dialect doesn't mean that you think grammar is 'elitist" just that you recognise language has different uses.

Mamie Mon 25-Jan-16 16:09:45

I would have thought it was an important language skill, to be able to use different registers for different occasions.

gettingonabit Mon 25-Jan-16 16:29:32

mamie I spend too much time on Mumsnetgrin. Teacher bashing is very much a "thing" over there.