Glorianny
Let’s agree to disagree then, my daughter, a primary school teacher, currently has 5 of her 34 reception children on the list for assessments, she has an extra Teaching Assistant to help her, 4 out of the 5 are boys, two are very violent and aggressive and one is a “runner”, one other is almost completely non verbal and, understandably , becomes very frustrated, very very quickly as it’s very difficult to know what he needs.
Lots of other little ones in the class have been hurt by two of the boys, who are both on short days at the moment as they simply cannot cope with full school days. One has been sent home once and when returned the next day did cope better. Every time there is an “incident” my daughter logs it after kneeling to the little one’s level and explaining gently that being aggressive towards others is not acceptable, as do the teaching assistants. One child scratches, punches, head butts and spits at both other children and adults.
Last week the reason he did this is because he was so upset that it wasn’t going home time. It’s awful for the children with additional needs, awful for the other pupils and awful for the school staff.
They have good strong policies, which are adhered to, and supportive Senior Leaders, and are a good school. The simple fact is not all children with additional needs should be in mainstream school.
I’m sure there are some schools who aren’t up to the job, but many are and there’s increasing numbers of little ones starting in reception with serious behaviour issues which are not just attributed to “additional needs”. Some in my daughter’s current class are unable to go to the toilet alone, hold a pencil or knife and fork, listen or sit still for a short while during carpet time.
All kinds of provision has been made to help those who need extra support and I’m sorry but funding IS certainly a factor as the waiting time for assessments is getting longer and longer due to staffing issues.