Using someone's previous abuse to hurt them/invalidate them
That's been done in both directions.
Arguing that parents could be sent to prison when any parent willing to risk prison is logically, very likely protecting their child.
But it's been proven that there is legal legislation that allows this, however unpalatable it may be.
Trying to use the murder of a child to prove a point, especially when it doesn't prove the point you want, only that the organisations in place to protect children sometimes make mistakes and allow abusive people access to children.
Including quoting about such incidents in Toronto.
Trying to goad AEC into to defending themselves to the point that threads are deleted or users banned
No one is responsible for anyone getting banned from GNHQ except the person themselves.
Expecting AEC to apologise or answer questions while doing the opposite yourself, especially not backing up false claims and definitely never admitting you are wrong.
Including telling a poster that they have received no "formal education" and refusing to acknowledge that this is offensive and apologise for it.
The word you are looking for is absurdity.
Correct.
Some just want attention, they don't care if it is positive or negative.
Correct.
Everything that needed to be said on this thread has been said.
Agreed.
